Posted on 03/13/2007 11:40:30 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
Britain is to enact the toughest laws on carbon emission in the world to reduce its impact on global warming, the Government announced yesterday.
The UK will be the first country to impose legally binding five-year limits on carbon emissions as ministers aim to set an example to the world on how to beat climate change.
Tony Blair declared the proposals a “revolutionary step” as he unveiled the draft Climate Change Bill yesterday to an audience of teenagers at Downing Street. He said that the legislation would strike a balance between the needs of the economy and the requirement to limit the environmental and social havoc likely to be wreaked by climate change over the next century.
The proposals were broadly welcomed by business groups, environmentalists and scientists, though there was some criticism that the Bill did not go far enough.
Among the proposals in the draft Bill are for five-year “carbon budgets” that will limit the quantity of carbon dioxide emitted nationally.
The first target will be for 2008-12 and David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, expects the Bill to receive Royal Assent by Easter next year.
The carbon budget will be set by the Government after taking advice from the new Committee on Climate Change and it will rely on a mixture of market forces, voluntary action and laws to meet targets.
Some of the mechanisms already exist, such as the Emissions Trading Scheme, or are planned, including zero-carbon housing from 2016. But others will be introduced when the need is identified.
Ministers have considerable freedom to determine where and how to impose emission limits but each carbon budget is likely to incorporate individual targets for different sectors. Levels will depend on factors such as how polluting a sector is, the technology available and the likely economic consequences.
The five-year limits are part of a rolling fifteen-year programme designed to achieve a statutory target of at least 26 per cent reduction of carbon by 2020 and 60 per cent by 2050, compared with 1990 levels.
Failure to meet the statutory targets will not result in criminal charges but, said Mr Miliband, the courts will have the power to force the Government to purchase carbon credits to reach the targets.
Aviation and shipping are to be excluded in the initial stages of the scheme but every other sector of society will be subject to the targets.The Government resisted pressure to introduce yearly targets but there will be annual reporting to Parliament on progress.
Mr Miliband said that the legislation would be an “envi-ronmental contract with future generations” and an essential step to limiting the effects of climate change.
He said that it provided a robust framework “for managing carbon and allocating responsibility” for emission cuts to turn Britain into a low-carbon economy.
“This Bill is an international landmark. It’s the first time any country has put carbon budgeting on to the legislative basis. I believe other countries will want to follow this,” he said.
Britain is responsible for about 2 per cent of carbon emissions and cannot solve climate change alone, but Mr Miliband hopes that the Bill will encourage countries such as China and India to sign up to long-term greenhouse gas cuts to ensure global temperature rises are limited to 2-3C (3.6-5.4F), in line with the Stern report.
Peter Ainsworth, the Shadow Environment Secretary, said that publication of the draft Bill was “a welcome step forward” but added that there were flaws. Calling for targets to be set annually by experts rather than politicians, he said: “There is a danger that the five-year approach will enable responsibility for failure to be shunted on from one government to another.”
Richard Lambert, the Direc-tor-General of the CBI, welcomed the aim of giving long-term policy assurances and the flexibility the Bill allows the Government in deciding how and where action must be taken. Tony Juniper, the director of Friends of the Earth, which campaigned for a Climate Change Bill, was “delighted” at the prospect of carbon laws but was disappointed that the aviation and shipping industries are to be exempt from the legislation.
So if the Sun decides it wants an ice age can we all sue Britain?
Do they mean low "carbs" instead?
What a scam.
What is really driving this carbon madness? Population control?
Are the sacrificing the word's human population to the earth goddess?
They should be setting tougher muslim immigration limits instead.
They can set all the goals they want, and generate all the positive publicity that comes with latching onto the environmental agenda, but every report shows that Europe, despite agreeing to the Kyoto Protocols, has hardly slowed down their greenhouse emissions. So, when facts are reviewed, it's all a bunch of "hot air".
The Brits used to be sensible people. Now they're going off the deep end. Even the Canadians have realized that Kyoto is a bogus ripoff. Looks like the Brits have the Global Warming Fever bad. Maybe it was all that tainted beef ("mad cow") they ate in the 90's, now all their brains are turning to mush.
Yes, yes, yes! Whom are the politicians trying to succor, and whyme?
It makes no rational sense...like killing yourself to prove how much you love somebody.
England will become a third-world, welfare state....just before they build the minarets over the Tower.
You've got a handful of socielist backed so-called "scientists" who can barely spell their names promoting the fairy tale of "Global warming" as a man-made technology-driven event and the rest of the actually credible scientific community flatly stating the causes are either part of a cyclical solar event or "other" potential cause.
So you enact legislation to cripple your society at the behest of the "nutter" crowd.
Brilliant...just brilliant...
zero-carbon housing?
Brick? Stone? No heat? No people?
It is sad that the Brits wish to nueter themselves with global warming hysteria, this is rather foolish on their part.
Britain has so many socialist stooges it's unbeleivable! Good God how stupid these people are. Throwing their economy into the tank for some phoney global warming nonsense. So be it, more of the world's share of trade for the US.
FLAMING IDIOTS! Who was that king that commanded the sea be whipped for sinking his ships?
Is there a word for "beyond stupid?" The UK itself produced a documentary debunking the carbon dioxide/climate change connection. Carbon dioxide increases after and as a result of global warming. Carbon dioxide does NOT cause global warming! The embarrassment and stupidity of such a billion dollar blunder is beyond words! But have you ever witnessed a politician really admit a mistake? After all they are lawyers not scientists for the most part!
Glad I'm not a British taxpayer.
All europe is totally in the tank for GW. State owned media helps produce unanimity.
Funny thing is the Euroweenies are exceeding emissions goals far more than we are.
I am. Guess how I feel about this :0(
AGW is such a stupid and obvious scam - and I believe it's reached its tipping point in the media. But our elite Government has long since insulated itself from reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.