[popdonnelly]

Hunter.

[Enosh]

Dennis Kucinich.

[Ol' Sparky]

How about Michael Bloomberg? Or Christie Todd Whitman? Or Arnold Schwartenkennedy? Or Lincoln Chaffee? All are Giuliani Republicans.

[veronica]

Fred Thompson, if he'll take it. Though I am not sure Thomspon has the experience to be POTUS. Reagan had a show biz background but also a more solid political background. It would be strong ticket regionally though.

[Hydroshock]

It matters not to me who this liberal chooses for his vp. I will never vote for him.

[B Knotts]

Hillary.

[bilhosty]

It should be Thompson.But, Tommy Thompson not Fred. The most successful Mayor in american history running with the most successful Governor in recent history. the sheer Gravitas of this ticket would overwhelm light weights like Obama and Edwards. Also Tommy would bring in Wisconsin and open more inroads to our premier growth region the upper Midwest. All Conservatives love him and that would help Rudy.
He would be very good president if he should need to take over. He is very much a visionary and the kind of person who changes things like Rudy. At his age he would be too old to run for President at the end of two terms which would be for the better.

[Condor51]

Well, the Veep should be someone the POTUS could get along with. Ergo, I'd say Rudy should pick ..... Heinrich Himmler.

Wait, Heinrich's dead. Darn it, now I have to start over.

Hmmm, maybe Mussolini? Nope dead too, drat. Stalin? Drat, dead. There's always Che! Wait .. dead too, oh cr@p.

I'm sorry Rudy will have to "Rule" by himself (which is how one Freeper referred to a Rudy presidency yesterday - he'd be our "Ruler".)

[Obadiah]

Another article strongly implying that Rudy is inevitable.

IF he does get the nomination he should just select Hillary as VP and then EVERYONE would be happy! And Rudy said there's not much difference in policy between them. The MSM would be happy. It would make all the moderate - "can we all get along" bipartisans happy. All the Libertarians who want so desperately to teach Republicans a lesson (Neal Boortz) would be happy. And about 6 months into Rudy's term Hillary would just have him Arkancided so she could become Queen, er, President, so, really, it's a win-win situation for almost everyone!!

[tkathy]

Dennis Miller

[DustyMoment]

Talk about putting the cart before the horse!!!

This is absurd!!!

[Pistolshot]

Hillary. There is very little difference between the two of them.

[Vaquero]

why would a liberal win the primaries.....I aint gonna happen....

[LdSentinal]

If he does choose a VP, it will be either David Vitter or John Cornyn.

[SampleMan]

Hillary or Obama. That would really bring in the blue state vote, which appears to be the entire purpose of a Rudy candidacy.

[Hot Tabasco]

FWIW, I was at an annual fund raising dinner for the Macomb County Republican Party last night and Rudy Giuliani was the guest speaker. I was seated at the table directly in front of the podium and when he and Candice Miller, my congresswoman, entered, they walked right by me and I was able to shake his hand.

My dad always taught me that when you shake someone's hand you use a firm grip like you mean it and you look them right in the eye. Mr. Giuliani did neither. His hand was weak and very soft and he didn't even bother to look at my face.........

Not exactly the demeanor of someone who wants my vote in the primary.

[garv]

Kate Michelman, but the question is absurd because Rudy's not getting the nomination.

[Brilliant]

Thompson

[TAdams8591]

Rudy is not going to win it. The much sharper, smarter, more articulate, more likable, far more conservative, handsomer, Romney is! : )

[rabidralph]

Susan Estrich