Posted on 03/17/2007 6:01:45 PM PDT by blam
If you want to feel younger, forget your statins
By James LeFanu, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 11:20pm GMT 17/03/2007
A doctor accused of wittingly prescribing useless or possibly lethal drugs would vehemently - and understandably - deny it. This makes it rather difficult to oppose the prevailing medical consensus on statins - the cholesterol-lowering drugs prescribed to four million people in Britain at a cost of £1 billion a year.
That's quite a sum. It could pay the salaries of 700,000 nurses or build two spanking new teaching hospitals.
An even bigger sum is £15 billion. That is the profit the pharmaceutical industry made last year from this, the most profitable class of drugs ever invented. They are so profitable that the latest statins to reach the market came with a £600 million promotion budget, to "promote" the notion to family doctors and policymakers that the lower the cholesterol the better, and that at least half the population would benefit from the drugs.
But it is not so. Statins are useless for 95 per cent of those taking them, while exposing all to the hazard of serious side-effects. Hence my ever-growing file of letters from those who regrettably have had to find this out for themselves, illustrated by this all-too-typical tale from Roger Andrews of Hertfordshire, first prescribed statins after an operation for an aortic aneurism (that he had cleverly diagnosed himself).
Over the past few years Mr Andrews had become increasingly decrepit -what can one expect at 74? - with pain and stiffness in the legs and burning sensations in the hands so bad that when flying to his son's wedding in Hawaii he needed walking sticks and a wheelchair at the transfer stops. However, he forgot to pack his statins, and felt so much better after his three-week holiday that when he got home he decided to continue the inadvertent "experiment" of not taking them. Since October most if not all of his crippling side-effects have gone. Several friends can tell a similar story, and they have friends too\u2026
The take-home message is that statins are only of value in those with a strong family history of heart disease or men with a history of heart attacks. For everyone else they are best avoided as they seriously interfere with the functioning of the nerve cells, affecting mental function, and muscles.
This is all wittily explained in a recent book by a Cheshire family doctor, Malcolm Kendrick, The Great Cholesterol Con (John Blake Publishing, £9.99). There are, I suspect, many out there, like Mr Andrews, wrongly attributing their decrepitude to Anno Domini, when the real culprits are statins. I would be more than interested to hear from anyone who finds that "giving them a rest" effects a similarly miraculous transformation.
For more critical views of many hyped aspects of modern medicine, I recommend:
"The Last Well Person"
by Nortin Hadler MD
Good find, Blam. I didn't know about this.
LOL! I've always said that the whole cholesterol hype is such a crock! 20 years from now we'll look back at the "conventional wisdom" in the same way we do "blood letting".
I wish I were taking statins for my decrepitude so I could stop taking them.
FMCDH(BITS)
My cholesterol went from 216 to 120 in two months on a statin
The odd thing about 'overhyped modern medicine' is that lifespans just keep on increasing and the quality of health just keeps on improving in the developed world. An remarkable situation considering all this modern medicine quackery....
Statins do put tremendous strain on the liver and kidneys.
However, with Heart Disease as a #1 killer, it would be hard to take this advice seriously.
I'd say, keep dosages as low as possible for these meds, and keep testing every six months for liver function and other complications.
Ancedontal stuff like this is interesting, but can really hurt people if they take it at face value without data to back it up.
My wife was on Lipitor for about 2 weeks and started to have severe pain in the muscles in her legs. I had read about this problem in a medical newsletter so I took her off them and started her on flush-free niacin. The pain went away and when she went in for her 6 month check the doctor was very pleased with the drop in her cholesterol level from the statin use. When she told him she had switched to niacin because of the leg pain he just told her to keep doing whatever she was doing.
After one heart attack and six bypasses, 20 years may be a bit iffy for me. I'll stick to my Vytorin and hope for the best.
"... £1 billion a year.
That's quite a sum. It could pay the salaries of 700,000 nurses..."
So, a nurse gets paid only £1420 a year? Either a very crappy nurse, or - where do they find so cheap ones?
There is little relationship between your "number" and heart disease. Statins are bad. If you want to lower numbers, take some policosonal. It's natural and won't turn your liver and kidneys into hamburger.
Whether we say that Divine Design, or Evolution, did it, there are REASONS WHY there are certain metabolic pathways, and shutting several off may have consquences unthought of when a certain number of patient-dose-years has accumulated.
Someday, mark my words, this issue is going to result in actions that will make the tobacco and asbestos settlements pale into chump change.
Look at this:
Sorry, but whenever I see fused benzene rings, and another "Chickenwire", unwanted carcinogen associations spring to mind. Oh, I am SURE these have been tested for carcinogenicity, but there are $billions at stake, and only Little People die.
Someday it will all come crashing down. The Industry says that, from the Helsinki Study on, the benefits of these outweigh all the risks, such as perpiheral neuropathy, kidney malfunction, etc. Then WHY did not everyone in the lard-eating 1950's all die of coronary disease?
Actuarily, not one day's life is gained by taking these...One does not die of as many circulatory defects, but they die on the same day they were going to without taking them, it appears.
Yes, I am highly suspicious, and especially at the costs! With copay, still $60 a month, for something a Junior Chem major could cook in his kitchen. Something is going on, and all Hell will break loose someday.
I felt so miserable, I could not keep taking it.
I kept on a relatively low-fat diet, and switched to policosanol, an inexpensive nutritional suppliment, and my last lipid test came out much improved. My doctor was suprised, as he was unfamiliar with policosanol.
Almost all drugs have side effects, and can therefore be inappropriately prescribed; but this particular class of drugs has saved an awful lot of lives.
I'm on Lipitor due to high cholesterol and a strong family history of heart disease; I've been watching for the side effects, but in my case, at my dose, I'm not experiencing any. When I've gone for a week or two between the end of a prescription and refilling it I haven't noticed any change in how I feel.
She thought it might have been a coincidence, and later went back on a statin, and within two weeks again developed neuropathy and memory impairment.
One of our astronauts Duane "Doc" Graveline had a similar experience with one of the statins and wrote a book about it.
My anectodal evidence shows that it does, so I'm sticking with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.