Skip to comments.
Proposals for Mental Health Parity Pit a Father’s Pragmatism Against a Son’s Passion
NY Times ^
| March 19, 2007
| ROBERT PEAR
Posted on 03/19/2007 7:06:19 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: Calvin Locke; zendari
I'm sure there are plenty of other Kennedys waiting in line for any political position that money can buy.
41
posted on
03/24/2007 7:42:15 PM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: spunkets
You have proven nothing except that you know nothing.
When asked to back up your science you cannot.
So therefore you are either an idiot or a fool. Either way thanks for proving absoultely nothing.
To: Almondjoy
I see. Ignoorance is bliss. Read a book.
43
posted on
03/24/2007 10:20:40 PM PDT
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: neverdem
Both bills seek to end discrimination against people with mental disorders by requiring insurers and employers to provide equivalent coverage, or parity, for mental and physical illnesses.
Another way of saying it, "Both bills seek to open the floodgates of insurance money to psychologists and other "therapists" so they can cash in like the real doctors already do."
44
posted on
03/24/2007 10:23:08 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson