Funny what studies like this say about the one who releases the studies.
Sexual division of labor early said that in most times and places, clothing and feeding the family with basics (gathering and gardening) was for the most part women's work in most places in the world through most of human history.
Funny how some social scientists seem to want to claim the guy roles for women, in part because the status involved. Truth is women's roles just aren't considered cool enough, especially by feminist scholars. When you read ancient texts, one learns I believe that the contributions of women were more prized in the societies involved (at least as producing valuable commodities) than we do now.
I am reminded of reading the Oddyssey and how all the high born ladies spent their time at clothmaking...and how valuable the commodities themselves were in the eyes of the contemporaries.
But that's not good enough for a certain type of scholar. Some want women to be Female men and the men to be Male women, and that, for the most part, is not how the world worked.
