--
Please, John, Please! It just won't be AS amusing if you don't run for President again.
He should come to Pelosi’s defense. He’s a traitor, too.
And this is only one of the massive problems with Kerry's thinking.
Didn’t Kerry visit with Assad sometime last year?
“Romney’s “knowledge of foreign affairs extends to briefing papers — not experience,’’ Kerry said of the former Massachusetts governor. “I’d rather have Nancy Pelosi’s input than his.” “
Now there you go again, Johnnie boy, pontificating again.
Traitros stick together it seems:
WASHINGTON — In a question-and-answer session before a Senate committee in 1971, John F. Kerry, who was a leading antiwar activist at the time, asserted that 200,000 Vietnamese per year were being “murdered by the United States of America” and said he had gone to Paris and “talked with both delegations at the peace talks” and met with communist representatives....
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/03/25/kerry_spoke_of_meeting_negotiators_on_vietnam/
Kerry knows all about meeting with the enemy. He did it in secrect with the Communist Vietnamese in 1972. The traitorous bastard.
Semper Fi’
Jarhead
I'd rather have the input of a braying jackass than yours John, so color us even.
The fugly, witless, inane bitch speaks.
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009903
Democrats took Congress last fall in part by opposing the war in Iraq, but it is becoming clear that they view their election as a mandate for something far more ambitious—to wit, promoting and executing their own foreign policy, albeit without the detail of a Presidential election.
Their intentions were made plain this week with two remarkable acts by their House and Senate leaders. Majority Leader Harry Reid endorsed Senator Russ Feingold’s proposal to withdraw from Iraq immediately, cutting off funds entirely within a year. He promised a vote soon, as part of what the Washington Post reported would also be a Democratic offensive to close Guantanamo, reinstate legal rights for terror suspects, and improve relations with Cuba.
Meanwhile, Speaker Nancy Pelosi made her now famous sojourn to Syria, donning a head scarf and advertising that she was conducting shuttle diplomacy between Jerusalem and Damascus. If there was any doubt that her trip was intended as far more than a routine Congressional “fact-finding” trip, House Foreign Affairs Chairman Tom Lantos put it to rest by declaring that, “We have an alternative Democratic foreign policy. I view my job as beginning with restoring overseas credibility and respect for the United States.”
.....
I am calling for the CENSURE (at LEAST!) of Ms Pelosi and her “cohort” Tom Lantos for their unlawful and dangerous meddling in foreign policy, which is not only NOT their job...it’s a crystal clear violation of the Logan Act!!!
These people really need to get the message. They simply cannot and must not carry out their own foreign policy no matter how much they think themselves entitled. I heard a few say earlier that they think members of Congress are exempted from prosecution under the Logan Act! Thats Bullsh*t!!! We have only ONE Commander-in-Chief and one “decider” in foreign policy. VP Cheney has called it “bad behavior”. I call it sedition!!
I am also calling for the resignation of both Pelosi and Lantos! Period!
How dare Kerry go to a foreign country and make these remarks????
Oh... I forgot that San Francisco is still part of the United States.
“I’d rather have Nancy Pelosi’s input than his.”
I’d rather have the input of a squirrel in my yard than anything either Pelosi or Kerry have to say. And I’d like to apologize to the squirrels for even making the comparison.
Halp Uss Jon Cary - We Nied Yur Aawsum Expiriance To Sav Tha Wurld!!
</sarcasm>
And yet he has a better grasp of the situation than either of you. Imagine that.
The ol’ FLip Flopper is at it again.
Was he against her trip before he was for it?
John F’n Kerry - POS(D-Cambodia)
“Kerry and his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry...”
Didn’t she drop the “Kerry” after 2004? The last name, I mean, not the cartoon character.