Posted on 04/06/2007 7:38:37 PM PDT by victim soul
Federal jury clears anti-abortion activist
A U.S. District Court jury deliberated for just over two hours before finding the Rev. Norman Weslin not guilty Thursday of blocking the entrance to an abortion clinic in violation of a federal law.
Weslin, 76, was arrested April 24, 2006, when he entered the Bellevue abortion clinic run by Dr. LeRoy Carhart.[Infamous Partial Birth Abortion specialist]
The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act forbids the use of "force, threat of force or physical obstruction" to prevent someone from providing or receiving reproductive health services.
Weslin had faced 18 months in a federal prison, three years of probation and a $25,000 fine if convicted.
Weslin's defense attorney, Martin A. Cannon, said that in the Bellevue incident, the priest had knelt in prayer inside a security vestibule and never entered the clinic's office. While inside he occasionally spoke to women "asking them not to kill their baby," Cannon said.
"He also spoke to clinic workers telling them not to work at the clinic and that he would help them find other jobs," Cannon said. "He actually is a kind man, who wouldn't hurt anyone."
Weslin, who was not available for comment, became teary-eyed after hearing the verdict and began singing "Ave Maria" with his supporters, Cannon said.
full story at http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=2360591
(Excerpt) Read more at omaha.com ...
Father says: "Happy Easter!! And never forget: 'We win!'"
If Rudy Giuliani were still a federal prosecutor, he would have had NO problem in putting Reverend Weslin on trial, and would have done his best to send him up the river.
Fortunately in this trial, God had other plans.
A Christian terrorist?
A Father Weslin ping...
According to the democrats, DUers and Daily Kos readers, this good man is more of a threat to America than islamic terrorism.
Is it just me or does he look a lot like a much younger Justice Kennedy?
Praise God Most High!
Why would a prosecutor waste government time and money in an attempt to jail a 76 year old man who had done nothing more than kneel, pray and talk to people? And why, if the AG is firing prosecutors, is this totalitarian bigot prosecutor not on top of the list?
Hagel Recommends Joe Stecher for U.S. Attorney
http://www.swnebr.net/newspaper/cgi-bin/articles/articlearchiver.pl?159409
The Carhart Testimony:
Death - Omaha Style
MTTU News - Omaha, Nebraska
http://mttu.com/Articles/The%20Abortionist%20Speaks.htm
In early December it was discovered that the University of Nebraska Medical Center was conducting experiments using brain tissue from pre-born children killed by the notorious partial birth abortionist Leroy Carhart.
What follows is court testimony from July ’97 where abortionist Carhart explains how he commits abortions.
When Larry Donlan of Rescue The Heartland attempted to read this statement at a N.U. Regents board meeting on Saturday December 11th, Regent Drew Miller tried to stop him claiming Carhart didn’t use this “procedure” for UNMC.”
Carhart is a specialist and the D&X is his specialty, which just so happens to be perfectly suited for collecting live brain tissue, so why wouldn’t he use it?” Donlan responded.
“Do you normally seek the services of a specialist and then tell him not to use his specialty? And if you insist he doesn’t use this method then tell us what method he does use?”
Mr. Miller had no answer to these questions so Donlan continued reading.
It was taped and played on a local radio program, the Steve Brown Show, the following Monday. It became a topic on that show for the next couple of days.
As Donlan read, a baby could be heard crying in the background.
Under oath in July 1997, abortionist Carhart comments on how he performs abortions. Here he is questioned by his attorney:
Question: Are there times when you don’t remove the fetus intact?
Carhart: Yes, sir.
Question: Can you tell me about that, when that occurs?
Carhart: That occurs when the tissue fragments, or frequently when you rupture the membranes, an arm will spontaneously prolapse through the oz. I think most...statistically the most common presentation, we talk about the forehead or the skull being first. We talked about the feet being first, but I think in probably the great majority of terminations, it’s what they world call a transverse lie, so really you’re looking at a side profile of a curved fetus. When the patient...the uterus is already starting to contract and they are starting to miscarry, when you rupture the waters, usually something prolapses through the uterine, through the cervical os, not always, but very often an extremity will.
Question: What do you do then?
Carhart: My normal course would be to dismember that extremity and then go back and try to take the fetus out either foot or skull first, whatever end I can get to first.
Question: How do you go about dismembering that extremity?
Carhart: Just traction and rotation, grasping the portion that you can get a hold of which would be usually somewhere up the shaft of the exposed portion of the fetus, pulling down on it through the os, using the internal os as your counter-traction and rotating to dismember the shoulder or the hip or whatever it would be. Sometimes you will get one leg and you can’t get the other leg out.
Question: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still alive?
Carhart: Yes.
Question: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still alive?
Carhart: Yes
Question: Do you consider an arm, for example, to be a substantial portion of the fetus?
Carhart: In the way I read it, I think if I lost my arm, that would be a substantial loss to me. I think I would have to interpret it that way.
Question: And then what happens next after you remove the arm? You then try to remove the rest of the fetus?
Carhart: Then I would go back and attempt to either bring the feet down or bring the skull down, or even sometimes you bring the other arm down and remove that also and then get the feet down.
Question: At what point is the fetus...does the fetus die during that process?
Carhart: I don’t really know. I know that the fetus is alive during the process most of the time because I can see fetal heartbeat on the ultrasound.
The Court: Counsel, for what it’s worth, it still is unclear to me with regard to the intact D&E when fetal demise occurs.
Question: Okay, I will try to clarify that. In the procedure of an intact D&E where you would start foot first, with the situation where the fetus is presented feet first, tell me how you are able to get the feet out first.
Carhart: Under ultrasound, you can see the extremities. You know what is what. You know what the foot is, you know, what the arm is, you know, what the skull is. By grabbing the feet and pulling down on it or by grabbing a knee and pulling down on it, usually you can get one leg out, get the other leg out and bring the fetus out. I don’t know where this...all the controversy about rotating the fetus comes from. I don’t attempt to do that. I just attempt to bring out whatever is the proximal portion of the fetus.
Question: At the time that you bring out the feet in this example, is the fetus still alive?
Carhart: Yes.
Question: Then what’s the next step you do?
Carhart: I didn’t mention it. I should. I usually attempt to grasp the cord first and divide the cord, if I can do that.
Question: What is the cord?
Carhart: The cord is the structure that transports the blood, both arterial and venous, from the fetus to the back to the fetus, and it gives the fetus its only source of oxygen, so that if you can divide the cord, the fetus will eventually die, but whether this takes five minutes or fifteen minutes and when that occurs, I don’t think anyone really knows.
Question: Are there situations where you don’t divide the cord?
Carhart: There are situations when I can’t.
Question: What are those?
Carhart: I just can’t get to the cord. It’s either high above the fetus and structures where you can’t reach up that far. The instruments are only 11 inches long.
Question: Let’s take the situation where you haven’t divided the cord because you couldn’t, and you have begun to remove a living fetus feet first. What happens next after you have gotten the feet removed?
Carhart: We remove the feet and continue with traction on the feet until the abdomen and the thorax came through the cavity. At that point, I would try ... you have to bring the shoulders down, but you can get enough of them outside, you can do this with your finger outside of the uterus, and then at that point the fetal ... the base of the fetal skull is usually in the cervical canal.
Question: What do you do next?
Carhart: And you can reach that, and that’s where you would rupture the fetal skull to some extent and aspirate the contents out.
Question: At what point in that process does fetal demise occur between initial remove...removal of the feet or legs and the crushing of the skull, or I’m sorry, the decompressing of the skull?
Carhart: Well, you know, again, this is where I’m not sure what fetal demise is. I mean, I honestly have to share your concern, your Honor. You can remove the cranial contents and the fetus will still have a heartbeat for several seconds or several minutes, so is the fetus alive? I would have to say probably, although I don’t think it has any brain function, so it’s brain dead at that point.
Question: So the brain death might occur when you begin suctioning out of the cranium?
Carhart: I think brain death would occur because the suctioning to remove contents is only two or three seconds, so somewhere in that period of time, obviously not when you penetrate the skull, because people get shot in the head and the don’t die immediately from that, if they are going to die at all, so that probably is not sufficient to kill the fetus, but I think removing the brain contents eventually will.
Later under cross examination from the AG’S counsel, Carhart stated:
“My intent in every abortion I have ever done is to kill the fetus and terminate the pregnancy.”
If nothing else, he looks out to lunch.
So this S.O.B. was just appointed to the US Attorney slot, and this case must have been one of his first pieces of business. Bush is such a patsy. What has Chuck Hagel done lately that should earn him Bush’s respect?
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
************
Good questions.
God Bless Father Weslin...he is a true hero!
For years he comes down the week after Christmas and leads a 72 hour prayer vigil in front of the local mill.
March 2004: Fr. Weslin celebrating Holy Mass directly across the street from Tiller the Killer's murder mill in Wichita.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.