Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would President Hillary Tap Chelsea? (for FLOTUS responsibilities)
US News & World Report ^ | March 18, 2007

Posted on 04/10/2007 7:10:35 AM PDT by presidio9

For media outlets breathlessly selling the story about how Bill Clinton would play the first lady role should his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, become president, well, just hang on a minute. We hear from key Clintonistas that there's an alternative to having Bubba around all the time, stealing the limelight. It's having Chelsea Clinton, the all-grown-up daughter, take over the East Wing. The scenario: Chelsea would move to the White House to handle social functions because the former president would be too busy with his surrogate work for his wife and his ongoing efforts for his foundation, which he'd probably move to Washington. And to keep out of Hillary's hair, he'd step up his already busy travel schedule out of Washington and the country.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; chelsea; chelseaclinton2020; clinton; flotus; hillary; stillapigafter14yrs; tehghey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2007 7:10:37 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Oh course then Chelsea can run for president as she will of had first hand knowledge on how to run the country. I think I’m gonna be sick


2 posted on 04/10/2007 7:12:28 AM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Just... ICK!


3 posted on 04/10/2007 7:13:11 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Chelsea for First Lady?

Shudder- sounds like the next generation is being groomed to continue the Clinton dynasty


4 posted on 04/10/2007 7:13:33 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

2 for the price of one! (barf alert)


5 posted on 04/10/2007 7:14:19 AM PDT by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Incest?


6 posted on 04/10/2007 7:14:21 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Would President Hillary Tap Chelsea?"

No, not gonna say it.

7 posted on 04/10/2007 7:14:25 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

Very believable scenario. The Oprah crowd will love it.


8 posted on 04/10/2007 7:14:50 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Would President Hillary Tap Chelsea?

Chelsea?

I don't think I'd tap it. I haven't seen any pictures lately though.

9 posted on 04/10/2007 7:15:01 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

this won’t work no matter how much Hillary would like it too..............the White House is only an acre and 1/2
squared and it takes an acre a cow to raise and feed em.With Hillary AND Chelsea both there someone is gonna go hungry.......


10 posted on 04/10/2007 7:16:30 AM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

We, (Americans collectively), are idiots. We strongly desire a royal class. The Bush and Clinton families are filling that need.

This could happen.


11 posted on 04/10/2007 7:17:19 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

12 posted on 04/10/2007 7:19:24 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

All that surgery, and she’s still homely.


13 posted on 04/10/2007 7:21:13 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

OK. Thanks. You said what I was going to say. That headline is disturbing. :O)


14 posted on 04/10/2007 7:21:53 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What is this “PResident Hillary” bull crap?????

I remember that I voted for George W. Bush as President, and his term isn’t up yet, and don’t go to the bank with the Hillary crap.....she just might not get there!!!


15 posted on 04/10/2007 7:22:01 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ("Grow your own DOPE, plant a LIB""Fred Thompson/Duncan Hunter 08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Ehhh....nah.

Thanks for snapping me to my senses though. ;-)

16 posted on 04/10/2007 7:22:31 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: veronica
All that surgery, and she’s still homely.

Huh? She's not a supermodel, but she doesn't cause clocks to stop, sour milk or have people gouging their eyes out.

17 posted on 04/10/2007 7:24:32 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise; CT-Freeper; veronica

Without the whore makeup, she looks more like my Senator every day.

18 posted on 04/10/2007 7:24:39 AM PDT by presidio9 (Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio; Froufrou
See post 18
19 posted on 04/10/2007 7:26:04 AM PDT by presidio9 (Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

After seeing that I would like to revise my post #17.


20 posted on 04/10/2007 7:26:25 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson