Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: telebob
Stalking...a restraining order would have denied him the ability to buy a gun.

Arson...a felony charge would have denied him the ability to buy a gun.

Then, of course, there is the failure of the psych system to formally identify him as a violent person.

Don’t blame the Virginia gun laws when the failure to abort this nut case belongs to others.

BINGO !

22 posted on 04/18/2007 8:50:36 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: XeniaSt

restraining orders would do it?

if that is true then it appears 2 young girls dropped the ball.

It’s a tough call.
Sometimes filing an order enrages the stalker and provokes him to action.

But in this case it may have prevented him from passing the background check?


24 posted on 04/18/2007 8:52:34 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson