Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
That is my whole point. I will vote for whichever R is nominated. I understand the danger of the clintons.

It is not your whole point. You are pushing a flawed candidate who would rift the party the way Papa Bush's leftward drift did in 1992.

Funny you should ask about GHWBush. He lost because he was a fool and ultimately irresponsible. He understood that the clintons were unfit to lead, he had the goods on clinton, but never used it.

Oh, yeah, sure. He had the goods on them. That's a good one.

Bush was a fool because he drifted leftwards. But he went nowhere near as far left as Rudy is now, even with his attempts to move rightward.

This is not unlike what you would be doing.

6.2 percent, Mia. That is Rudy's support among Freepers. Pretty pathetic. Shows he has no support among conservatives. You need to drop your support of Rudy and quit trying to redefine the concept of pro-life the way you have here. Our definition of such works just fine.

25 posted on 04/19/2007 11:56:05 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Did you click the link and listen to what Bush41 said about clinton?

Surely you don’t doubt that Bush had access to documentation of all the nasty clinton stuff.

BTW, just heard an updated Quinnipiac University Poll released today. Rudy would defeat hillary in NJ 49-40.


27 posted on 04/19/2007 12:05:59 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

Are you saying that you really aren’t pro-LIFE, that you are only anti-abortion?


28 posted on 04/19/2007 12:09:10 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; mia; areafiftyone

How can Rudy be flawed when most Republicans support him by a HUGE majority over the second popular candidate. Your logic is FLAWED.

The reason, IMO, that Ronald Reagan was elected twice has more to do with his appeal. He made me and people believe in themselves, in the future of America, he made us feel positive about the future of our country. He was a positive man. Americans love that charisma about their president. It had little to do with pro life, anti gay, social issues. Federal government should keep their noses out of most of these issues, IMO. They belong at the STATE level.

IMO, Mia is one of the brightest, smartest, astute people on this forum. Her goal, as is mine.... is to DEFEAT the MARXIST/Socialist/Hitler/ candidate Hillary Clinton....or Obama/Osama/Hussein. There is no other candidate at this moment that shows an ability to win. If and when that candidate shows up, I’ll be supporting that R candidate. To do anything else is plain IDIOTIC and Suicidal politically speaking.

Go MIA..... we love you and what you’ve done for FR.


47 posted on 04/19/2007 1:53:37 PM PDT by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson