Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

My positions aren’t etched in stone. That would be foolish. Conditions change.

The idea is to win so that the defective and dangerous clintons do not retake the White House, not that any particular R becomes president.

We should field the strongest R. To do any less would be irresponsible.


30 posted on 04/19/2007 12:16:49 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
The idea is to win so that the defective and dangerous clintons do not retake the White House

Hillary Clinton is a red herring -- if she manages to win the Dem primary, she will lose to any competent opponent.

We should field the strongest R. To do any less would be irresponsible.

Not if that "R" is a complete betrayal of conservatism. We gain NOTHING in that scenario.

32 posted on 04/19/2007 12:22:07 PM PDT by kevkrom (Al Gore is to Global Warming as L. Ron Hubbard is to Scientology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Super post Mia, and you didn’t have to resort to name-calling or labeling those that disagree with you a “Treasonous Liberal”.


36 posted on 04/19/2007 12:55:43 PM PDT by Registered (Politics is the art of the possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
My positions aren’t etched in stone. That would be foolish.

Tell that to God. He put his positions into stone. What is good and right today will be good and right tomorrow.

Conditions change.

Typically heard out of a 'progressives' mouth when talking about why we need Homosexual marriage after thousands of years of Marriage being Man and Woman! Typically heard out of a progressives mouth when talking about idiotic Sexual Harassment and Gun Control Laws! Typically heard out of a 'progressives' mouth when talking about hate crimes.

The idea is to win so that the defective and dangerous clintons do not retake the White House, not that any particular R becomes president.

In winning at all cost we become the Clintons.

We should field the strongest R. To do any less would be irresponsible.

So if we could get John Skarry, The Goreacle, or Bubba himself to run as a R, and they had the best chance of beating Hillary you would vote for them?

64 posted on 04/19/2007 2:39:53 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
'08 Candidates: Consideration
ABC News/Washington Post poll

--------Definitely would NOT support--------

  54%    47%    45%     40%     36%    35%

Romney McCain Clinton Giuliani Obama Edwards

--------------------------------------------
http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/1036a4Election.pdf

Clinton is one of the weakest Democrat candidates to come along in recent memory. Why would we increase her chances of success by nominating an equally-weak candidate like Romney, McCain, or Giuliani?

65 posted on 04/19/2007 2:39:54 PM PDT by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson