Thanks for the expression of appreciation. :)
I don’t want to see any of our children—the living, the unborn, the not yet even imagined— ‘butchered’. But surely you understand that one will ‘butcher’ them more efficiently than hillary clinton.
To be clear, to avoid voting for Rudy, (who will appoint strict constructionist judges and prosecute the war with all he has-what more can a president functionally do?), you will, in fact, be placing your de facto vote for hillary clinton, inept, corrupt and seditious, who WILL SURELY NOT ONLY APPOINT PRO-ABORTION JUDGES, SHE WILL MAKE SURE ABORTION IS MORE READILY AVAILABLE THAN IT IS NOW. And that doesn’t even begin to explore all the other ways she will put our children’s lives in peril.
If this isn’t immoral, irrational and self-destructive, I don’t know what is.
Sorry m'am, but Rudy's track record as to appointing judges etc, shows a 85%+/- in favor of "D" party members.
Then we add in his 'open borders' and anti Second Amendment attitudes ....
I can over look his draft dodging, hell we were all scared kids in those days, some found their manhood, other choose to act manly via chasing ladies (Little shot at Newt there too).
If this is the best the Republicans can do, then we (IMHO) deserve to lose.
Cold blooded surely, but if the Party has moved that far left, then I'm gone.
It will not be my fault, but the fault of GOP, and all the Rudyphiles.
There are many like me.
See, there's that false dichotomy again. I will not give in to your invalid assumptions that supporting someone other than Guiliani in the GOP primaries is "giving" the election to Clinton.
Such position is asinine, insulting, and would accept the permanent defeat of conservatism.