Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
I watched the interview. We would benefit from a lie-detector test given to Tenet. He denies meaning that slam dunk meant other than how the world reads it. He claims outright that he believed his analysts when they told him that Iraq has WMD [and let's read that as something with mushroom potential not something used years ago] Probably the same analysts who claimed that for the aspirin factories bombed by Clinton.

Of very strong interest is why was [is] he never asked is, 'Why did you believe your analysts and not the inspectors who actually looked'.

10 posted on 04/29/2007 5:25:07 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ex-snook

I watched the interview and like how it stood up to the nut pelley. Then he sortof went nuts regarding Cheney and the “slam dunk” remark. I don’t get why these people go around apologizing and backtracking. There WERE in fact WMDs, how many Kurds were killed by them???
They should stick with it and insist on the probability that they were moved to Syria.
sheesh!


12 posted on 04/29/2007 5:30:16 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

The consummate example of the 'Peter Principle'

14 posted on 04/29/2007 5:31:06 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson