Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Reading about Christopher Hitchens' is almost as much fun as the real thing. (I'm not sure but I think Kingsley confesses his atheism too.)
1 posted on 05/13/2007 3:36:22 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123

I say all this not having read the book, so perhaps the fault is with the author of this piece, but Hitchens seems to have a basic lack of knowledge and understanding of Christianity (I say that from a Catholic perspective). He also compares apples and oranges (throw Christianity, ID, and the cult of mohammedism together as if they were comparable). “when supposedly he(Christ) also did not die at all?” Nonsense. I would ask Mr. Hitchens, how does one rise from the dead without dying?

“To him, it’s blindingly obvious: the great religions all began at a time when we knew a tiny fraction of what we know today about the origins of Earth and human life. It’s understandable that early humans would develop stories about gods or God to salve their ignorance. But people today have no such excuse. If they continue to believe in the unbelievable, or say they do, they are morons or lunatics or liars. “The human wish to credit good things as miraculous and to charge bad things to another account is apparently universal,” he remarks, unsympathetically.”
Well, Mr. Hitchens, even now we have only a best, slightly educated, guess as to the origins of life and the planet, so the argument that we now “know better” and thus have no “need” for God or religion, is an empty argument. Additionally, as you point out, it’s a human wish to attribute good and evil, and not necessarily an accurate understanding of God’s will, but an attempt to make sense of the fallen world we live in.

Sounds to me like his whole book is a self-absorbed “aren’t I smart” display without much substance.


2 posted on 05/13/2007 4:30:37 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

I took it that way too, about Kinsley being an atheist, but I too am not 100% sure. A very amusing column, thanks for posting it.

However, I have to question this assertion “Religious leaders from all the major faiths, who disagree on some of the most fundamental questions, managed to put aside their differences to agree that Rushdie had it coming.”

I certainly do not recall anything like that. And it annoys me to have the, shall we say “excesses” of Mohammedism confabulated with other religions. Maybe some one can clarify.


5 posted on 05/13/2007 5:39:08 AM PDT by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

I know this is a horrible thing to say, but Hitch, I’d probably miss if he ended up going to the other place because he was an atheist.

Kinsley...not so much.


8 posted on 05/13/2007 7:38:55 AM PDT by RichInOC (I believe that God exists, that He intervenes in His creation, and that He's a bit of a comedian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson