Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Rudy is Striking Out (Excellent editorial on the demise of Rudy's candidacy)
Townhall.com ^ | May 13, 2007 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 05/13/2007 3:38:27 AM PDT by dschapin

Why Rudy is Striking Out... By Kevin McCullough Sunday, May 13, 2007

Mayor Rudy Giuliani intended to use the chance to address students and faculty at Houston Baptist University on Friday to boost his image and clarify his position - particularly on abortion. He also hoped to energize what is beginning to look like a campaign that is in complete meltdown.

Republican presidential hopeful and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani speaks to over 800 people gathered for a breakfast sponsored by The Tuscaloosa County Republican Party Wednesday, May 9 2007 at the Bryant Conference Center in Tuscaloosa, Ala. He failed on every level.

Coming out of the first Presidential Candidate debate he was established as the clear loser in many respects. His mumbling, stumbling, bumbling and shrugging of the shoulders on the simple question put to him on the issue of Roe v. Wade truly isolated him from the rest of the field.

He is also bending believability.

In his address at HBU on Friday he took more time than I had heard him use in the past to describe the "two pillars" of his thinking on the matter.

The first pillar is his supposed personal belief that abortion is "deeply, profoundly, and always morally wrong." He belabored the point by emphasizing that if he were to counsel someone personally, that he would always advise them against abortion and would encourage them to have the baby. Once born, if they were unable to care for it, he would encourage them to consider the adoption option.

His second pillar was his belief that our society "must always grant the woman" the "right to make the choice". He didn't really elaborate on the specifics of what they would be choosing, but we are to assume that the choices are somewhere between the "always morally right" decision to have a child, or the "always immoral" decision to kill one.

The Mayor continued by addressing the issue of partial birth abortion. He added that he felt it should have been kept legal to protect the life and health of the mother. Interestingly enough the American Medical Association has denounced this method of ever being medically necessary to "save a woman's life." And the word "health" could be interpreted as lightly as "mental health" which could be interpreted as lightly as "I just don't FEEL like having this baby" which you then realize is in fact a term that means nothing.

Giuliani also seemed to imply that he opposed federal funding for abortion as part of his "giving the woman the option."

He then pledge to work to limit abortions, put restrictions on them, and for added good measure he bragged that adoptions went up under his administration in New York by some 130%.

The problem was the entire pretense of Giuliani's position on abortion is a sham, at least the side of viewing it as "always morally wrong." Moments before he was to give the address in Houston, Fox News Channel's Carl Cameron did a cut-in with an exclusive discovery. Cameron had uncovered a National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) Survey that Giuliani had filed with them in running for office back in 1997. In the Mayor's own handwriting exists the proof that Giuliani opposed parental notification, and any limits on the always unnecessary procedure of partial-birth abortions. He also advocated more federal funding for abortions. He has also given multiple donations to the racist genocidal organization that was founded upon the desire of eliminating blacks - Planned Parenthood.

Discerning people don't even need the evidence of a NARAL survey to see through Giuliani's ineptitude on moral issues. His stated "pillars" tell us everything we need to know.

With the discovery last week that gender can now be identified in the unborn child only six weeks after conception, coupled with the increasing abilities to see a child survive to a healthy life outside the womb, earlier and earlier in the pregnancy, the issue of personhood continues to be Giuliani's downfall.

Since he was in Houston, let's use a local example.

Many remember Andrea Yates who systematically drowned her five children in her own bathtub. Certainly Mayor Giuliani would share our horror and condemn such actions as "always morally wrong." Surely he would have - had he been given the chance - to counsel Andrea to not go through with such a procedure. He would have attempted to convince her that it would be better for the child, and for her to give those children up for adoption. There is no doubt in my mind that he would have even called for police intervention had he been able to divine ahead of time her intent to murder her children.

But by using the Mayor's own logic and his "other pillar of thinking" he would have felt that it would have been equally important to "give her the option, to make the choice" to carry out her plan.

This is where Rudy's logic is so flawed that it defies explanation. And it is this confusion in the arena of moral clarity that calls into question his ability to be morally clear in his governing skills.

The problem with his two pillars is that even Rudy Giuliani doesn't fully believe them both. It is also obvious from his record which of the "two pillars" he believes, and which one he is now giving lip service to.

If he wished to disprove this and in fact attract genuine pro-life voters let me propose a specific tactic for his campaign. In his discussion of "compromise" and the need to hold to his "two pillars" how about this:

Propose sweeping legislation to ban all abortions with the exceptions of rape, incest, and the mother's life.

This compromise would eliminate roughly 98% of all abortions performed, and even though we truly pro-life types would still work to ban the remaining 2%, it would allow the "needed exceptions" that the Mayor espouses are "so important."

Rudy Giuliani is the most full throated pro-abortion Republican candidate for President in history. In all transparency he must be acknowledged as such.

Rudy's poll numbers are sagging in Iowa and New Hampshire, and without radical change in his thinking those trends will hold, and somewhere around South Carolina the Mighty Mayor will strike out.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; cultureofdeath; giuliani; giulianitruthfile; kevinmccullough; moralabsolutes; nomination; prolife; rudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: ZULU
Yes he is. I do like him as a human being. I just don't agree with his views.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

61 posted on 05/13/2007 5:04:07 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“I do like him as a human being.”

I find it hard to personally like a duplicitous individual whose arrogance and conceit almost made him the most hated mayor in New York City before 9-11.

I don’t like liars and I don’t like serial polygamists and I don’t like people who try to subvert my constitutional rights.


62 posted on 05/13/2007 5:11:03 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Regardless of the journey, I think many will arrive at the same destination. Guiliani is not a candidate that any real conserative will embrace.


63 posted on 05/13/2007 5:31:07 PM PDT by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Well, they are close to dems so I would’nt be surprised if the vote for the other rat.


64 posted on 05/13/2007 5:52:34 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

All of the above-he is a NYC elitist who doesn’t even know there is the “rest of the country.”

I’m a Texan living in NY state, and there are a number of people, particularly urban denizens, up here who couldn’t care less about the rest of the country and don’t know anything about the rest of the country. The funny thing about it is that that attitude pretty much stops once you cross the NY/PA stateline. I speak from personal experience.

As far as I’m concerned, NYC/boroughs, etc. should be converted to a fully owned, in perpetuity, colony of the US, something like Hong Kong was to the British. And, it should be made to pay through the nose for its privilege of being under the umbrella of the US. Therefore, it would receive some of the treatment, in kind, that it has dished out to the rest of the country, including the balance of NY State.

Flame away, Big Apple lovers!


65 posted on 05/13/2007 5:59:20 PM PDT by izzatzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

Not only is Rudy wrecking his own reputation, his odd behavior is highlighting the “oddness” of pro-aborts in general.


66 posted on 05/14/2007 2:57:15 AM PDT by syriacus (Shock a lib today. Hand them a copy of the censorship rules imposed by Truman's govt in Jan., 1951.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

“Yes, he’ll kill more of our babies, but he will really fight the war on terror!” (The state of the Rudybots on FR)


67 posted on 05/14/2007 11:28:06 AM PDT by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33
There are a lot of conditions during pregnancy, frequently having to do with diabetes, kidney and liver function, etc., that might harm the mother and require an abortion.

A very strange one: My wife turned out to be “allergic” to pregnancy. During the entire pregnancy she was extremely nauseous - unable to keep food down, etc. Apparently it was caused by her own hormones. Only some newly introduced (and expensive!) anti-nausea meds allowed her to carry to term; she was till miserably sick the entire time. If it had happened a little earlier...

68 posted on 05/14/2007 11:41:34 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Thank you very much for your reply and I am glad for your wife. I guess what I really want to know is, of all abortions performed in the US, what percentage is because of rape, incest, or health of the mother? My guess is the percentage is rather low.


69 posted on 05/14/2007 4:10:20 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NordP

Interesting — what I heard from the same interview was Giuliani again focusing on police tactics such as the PATRIOT Act, surveillance, etc., and calling that “being on the offense.” In reality, these are defensive tactics used domestically for the most part to try to prevent individual attacks. This is the very essence of swatting at flies — Giuliani proposes to take us back to treating terrorism as a crime and fighting it with police tactics. There was zero talk of draining the swamp and how he might strategically change the regions of the world that are breeding terrorists. Even when he was asked about Iraq, he discussed it mostly in the context of not wanting to announce a timetable for retreat.

This “fight terrorism primarily as a crime” approach isn’t surprising, since he has zero foreign policy experience and has spent his whole life in crime-fighting. But it’s exactly what we don’t need to effectively win the war on Islamofascists.


70 posted on 05/14/2007 6:27:56 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ellery

Yes, but the element of striking back with strength, instead of letting the enemy wonder if you will roll over and pee on yourself (like Clinton days). THAT was refreshing.


71 posted on 05/14/2007 7:28:59 PM PDT by NordP (The greatest gift God can give us is LIFE. The greatest gift man can give to another is FREEDOM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tenthirteen
His strongest suit right now, IMO, is leadership.

The more he flip-flops, the more he lies, and the more he blames subordinates for bad decisions he made while Mayor, the more he demonstrates how threadbare that suit actually is.

72 posted on 05/17/2007 2:18:01 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson