[Cicero]

I can see that homosexuals might like to have a bar where they can relax among their own without fear about being laughed at.

But the question is, why can’t other groups do the same? Where do you draw the lines? (As if I had to ask.)

[Ohioan]

Of course, your point is well taken. The idea of passing laws that prevent people congregating with those they choose, rather than a congregation dictated by Leftist theorists, is part and parcel of a Leftist egalitarian attack on traditional society.

Those who have woken up lately, to realize with astonishment that our immigration laws since 1965 actually favor non-White, Third World immigrants, over those from the traditional stocks that settled America, should realize the obvious connection. The "Civil Rights" movement in America was not a celebration of American values--as is sadly taught in many schools--but a deliberate attack on those values. The traditional American view of liberty, comes from the principles recognized in Magna Carta, including property rights and commercial freedom. The "Civil Rights" movement was a direct attack on those principles. And almost to a man, those who voted for the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 & 1965, in Washington, were the same people who put through the Immigration Reform Act of 1965.

I just wanted to applaud your tongue in cheek point; but apologize for getting this thread off the particular Australian point.

William Flax