He’s talking about John Derbyshire, who is off the reservation at NRO on more than a few issues.
His comment was actually that all the uproar about pardoning Scooter would be more appropriately aimed at getting pardons for the two Border Patrol agents who were recently convicted.
I’m agnostic on both cases, but I do know there are probably thousands of low-profile individuals who are at least as deserving of a pardon as Mr. Libby, but nobody is making a fuss over them.
He’s implying that Derbyshire’s comment is the only view that has been expressed at NRO. Although I disagree with Derb COMPLETELY on this, I dont see anything wrong with him offering a view contrary to what the editors expressed in their editorial. NRO would be quite boring if all the writers thought alike.