Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
Your post answered my first question. This judge reversed the actions of the Bureau because he thought his opinion is better than anyone else's. My first question was, is this a Clinton appointee? His appointees tend to share the arrogance of the man who appointed them.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "John Edwards: 21st Century Marie Antoinette"

4 posted on 06/08/2007 7:44:50 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

When I post a story about a Judge’s ruling, I usually check on the background of the judge. I have been surprised from time-to-time, but not very often. But even Presidents get surprised from time-to-time regarding their own appointments.


6 posted on 06/08/2007 7:49:18 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
The new regulations, the first overhaul of the rules since 1995

Which was when Clinton was in office...which was when this judge was appointed.

24 posted on 06/09/2007 6:12:41 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson