Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC 'risked safety of troops'
Daily Telegraph ^ | 20 June, 2007 | Brendan Carlin

Posted on 06/19/2007 8:25:44 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy

The BBC was accused last night of risking the safety of British forces in Iraq after trawling for information on troop movements in the war-torn country.

Politicians reacted in disbelief to the revelation that for over two hours yesterday, the BBC News website carried a request for people in Iraq to report on troop movements.

The request was removed from the website after it sparked furious protests that the corporation was endangering the lives of British servicemen and women.

But according to accounts last night, a story on a major operation by US and Iraqi troops against al-Qa'eda somewhere north of Baghdad contained an extraordinary request for information about the movement of troops.

Last night the BBC confirmed the wording of the request was: "Are you in Iraq? Have you seen any troop movements? If you have any information you would like to share with the BBC, you can do so using the form below."

The BBC confirmed last night that this form of words had appeared on the website from "late morning" until early afternoon.

"It was down by 2pm," The Daily Telegraph was told.

A spokesman was unable to offer a detailed explanation of why anyone at the BBC should be seeking such information or whether any details on troop movements had been received.

He refused to identify who put the message up but said that "the journalist" responsible had been reminded that "this is not a form of words we would use".

However, in a statement, the BBC added: "BBC Online regularly asks visitors to its websites to supply information they may have relating to a specific story through a response form posted at the end of a news item.

"This particular page should not have been published. The BBC never broadcasts or publishes information which may put British troops at increased risk."

The Ministry of Defence was not aware of the affair yesterday until alerted by The Daily Telegraph.

However, a spokesman said: "We would take this incredibly seriously if it's true. We are checking this with our guys out in Iraq."

Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, 151 UK troops have lost their lives, 115 of them in hostile action.

The Conservatives demanded an investigation be carried out into the information search and urged the BBC to make sure any information received had not fallen into the wrong hands.

Liam Fox, the Shadow Defence Secretary, voiced his shock at what he claimed was a "bizarre" request for information about army movements.

"I am appalled because it shows either a wilful disregard for the safety of our Armed Forces or a shocking lack of understanding about their safety.

"It makes me wonder who makes these decisions. The BBC now needs to have urgent discussions with the Armed Forces as to how this message came about," Dr Fox said.

The blunder sparked a flood of protests from army insiders and servicemen's relatives, posted on the Army Rumour Service website (www.arrse.co.uk). One woman, who described herself as an "Army wife", said she was "shocked and dismayed" that the BBC was asking people "to report our troop movements on an open forum which could be read by insurgent forces and/or their allies".

The BBC insisted last night that the information would not have been published, saying "this was not a blog".

But the woman went on: "Surely if you want reporting done, you have staff who are able to do that for you. Otherwise why do we pay over £100 in licence fees?"

Another wrote: "Did you realize that the BBC are now helping insurgents in northern Iraq with their intelligence?"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bbc; iraq; treason; troopmovement
See also: (Vanity) BBC Withdraws request for "troop movement" reports
1 posted on 06/19/2007 8:25:45 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Clearly BBC exists in its own universe, if they assumed that no one would protest this.


2 posted on 06/19/2007 8:27:02 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

strangely sounds like a Geraldo chant...


3 posted on 06/19/2007 8:30:38 PM PDT by RDTF (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
The request was removed from the website after it sparked furious protests

Blah, blah, bullcrap. Bunch of 'furious' people my butt. Furious people would completely turn their backs on the BBC, this won't register a blip by tomorrow. Bunch of hot air not matter how treasonous it is.

4 posted on 06/19/2007 8:32:07 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

The leftists are determined to see us lose this thing.


5 posted on 06/19/2007 8:33:19 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
6 posted on 06/19/2007 8:36:30 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
7 posted on 06/19/2007 8:36:41 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sax

damn, a double post. and now claiming ‘my bad’ makes a third.


8 posted on 06/19/2007 8:38:02 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sax

Thanks I was looking for that pic!

Thanks I was looking for that pic!

:)


9 posted on 06/19/2007 8:43:28 PM PDT by RDTF (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
"the journalist" responsible had been reminded that "this is not a form of words we would use".

Ooo, I bet that left a mark!

10 posted on 06/19/2007 8:47:48 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

A crew of Royal Navy ship in the Gulf unanimously BANNED the showing of BBC News reporting during the early stages of the war citing extreme bias and dishonesty in the reporting, saying it was counterproductive to ship’s morale.


11 posted on 06/19/2007 8:48:07 PM PDT by Wil H (Islam - the religion of perpetual outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

How about launching a website with minute-by-minute reports on just where BBC reporters could be kidnapped?


12 posted on 06/19/2007 8:48:37 PM PDT by cookcounty (No journalist ever won a prize for reporting the facts. --Telling big stories? Now that's a hit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
That, I think, is the problem. People who work for the BBC think they’ve arrived at the top and they lose their drive to be good reporters; too much *me* and *us* factor in their reporting.
13 posted on 06/20/2007 3:30:53 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Bump

Arrests are needed at the BBC


14 posted on 06/21/2007 5:49:16 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
this is not a form of words we would use

He probably means they should have worded it differently so it wouldn't be so obvious what they were up to. I bet the dirty bastards still want the intel.
15 posted on 06/21/2007 7:12:59 PM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson