Posted on 06/21/2007 6:07:11 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
Was the “structural imbalance” as defined in the .pdf mentioned in the context of the larger media outlets?
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.
I did, too, Tex.
When will some finally wake up and realize it's not Democrat v. Republican. It's the establishment against the people.
Hillary makes me wanna heave. She and her “women in pants” lesbo entourage are just one reason to fight censorship of the airwaves. Dr. Savage says it all when he says “liberalism is a mental order.” All I can say is Amen.
It will when you have a "living" constitution.
Per Mark Levin, Lott has supported the Stalinist Fainess Doctrine in the past.
My blog post has a link to the audio, it’s one killer smackdown of a rant.
http://paindealer.blogspot.com/2007/06/mark-levin-smacks-down-trent-lott.html
There are two areas the comrades here in the USA don’t have “speech regulation” on,that being talk radio and the medium we all use and love here the internet. Talk radio is in their crosshairs and trust me the internet isn’t far behind !!!
Hey, Babs and Shrill,
When the only way for you and yours to win or even hold on is to silence any opposing views, like a snake with its head cut off you may still be flapping around but you’re done.
No, about half will be unarmed. The rest are hypocrites who think THEY have a right to own a gun, you don’t. But I’ll bet we are better shots.
"Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized. In the first it is ridiculed, in the second it is violently opposed, in the third it is regarded as self-evident." -Arthur Shopenhauer
Looks like America finally reached the violently opposed stage of new media truth.
You mean our constitution? I don’t believe they give it a second thought.
When Reagan's FCC refused to enforce it the "Democrats" took them to court and lost.
The "Democrats" tried again with a rewrite of the regulation requiring executive branch enforcement, but 1st Reagan & then Bush Sr. vetoed them. I don't think we can be certain that the compassionate "conservative" one would do the same.
That has been a known fact for years.
Hillary knows that she must first neutralize Conservative talk radio and forums such as Free Republic if she is to gain and keep power.
If she is elected President it is all over because she will not leave once she gets in.
But in the end everything works for the best because if she is elected, then we, Conservatives , will see what we are made of.
They are really toying with the wrong crowd here.
Soviet style control will fail. Good luck, liberals!!!!!!!!
BTW, the MSM is one sided and you are in bed with them. The consevatives have no need for you as a partner.
What a situation..the current President is a Globalist and the possible next President is a Stalinist!
You got that right for sure. These elitist liberals are scared $&!#less of the great unwashed out in the hinterlands and thereby want to limit our favored news outlets and disarm us. Concerning your comment about the 2nd amendment; I am somewhat doubtful about who will “walk the talk” when it comes time to step across the line in the sand and be counted. But I agree that the time may be coming. If or when the Dem’s (aka elitist socialists) win the White House and both houses, this bunch will pass legislation to ensure that they never loose power again - you can take that to the bank - although it will be a socialist bank....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.