ADVANCE FOR JULY 15; graphic shows number of U.S. aircraft bombings in Iraq since 2006
Posted on 07/10/2007 11:21:51 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - The White House is rethinking its diplomatic options in Iraq, but won't reconsider its military strategy before an assessment from war commanders is presented in September, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
President Bush's top war advisers, Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute and Stephen Hadley, went to Capitol Hill to assure Republican supporters that a precipitate pullout of troops won't happen. Sens. Trent Lott of Mississippi, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John McCain of Arizona, Jon Kyl of Arizona and others met with the two advisers in Vice President Dick Cheney's office off the Senate floor.
Graham said members were told that Bush would back them in fiercely opposing legislation by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., that would order troop withdrawals to start in 120 days.
Bush himself said Tuesday he had no intention of succumbing to political pressure. During a visit to Parma, Ohio on Tuesday, he reiterated that troop levels in Iraq "will be decided by our commanders on the ground, not by political figures in Washington, D.C."
"I fully understand that this is a difficult war. It's hard on the American people but I will once again explain the consequences of failure," he said.
Graham told reporters the White House is looking at new ways to hasten progress in two primary areas: destroying al-Qaida in Iraq and forcing the U.S.-backed government in Baghdad to make political progress.
"I think you're going to find a united front at the White House and to give Gen. (David) Petraeus the time he needs to do nothing to undercut the surge" of troops, Graham said.
A key progress report being briefed to members Thursday will say the Iraqi government has not met any of its targets for reform but has made some progress in about more than a half-dozen areas, including tamping down violence in Anbar province.
Democrats said the only way Baghdad and its neighbors would take more responsibility in Iraq would be if the U.S. starts to pull out.
Levin, D-Mich., and Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., want legislation that would order Bush to begin pulling out troops in four months and end combat by April 30, 2008. The measure would allow for some troops to remain to conduct counterterrorism, train the Iraqi security forces and protect U.S. infrastructure.
"There is much too little pressure on Iraqi leaders to do what they have to do," said Levin, chairman of the Armed Services Committee.
White House spokesman Tony Snow earlier Tuesday downplayed the significance of the report coming later in the week, calling it only "a look at the starting line" of the U.S. troop surge.
Levin's proposal, offered as an amendment to a $649 billion defense policy bill, is expected to fail because Republicans say they still oppose setting timetables.
But in a sign that GOP frustration with the war is growing, Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., said he would co-sponsor Levin's measure and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, said she was considering switching her position and backing the measure. Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., was considered another likely supporter.
Sen. Susan Collins, Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and other moderates said they were considering an alternative proposal that would demand an end to combat and allow U.S. troops to conduct only a narrow set of missions. The measure would not identify a date.
"What many of us are looking for is a new strategy that would not be a precipitous pullout with all of the problems that would cause, but rather a plan to exit over the next year," said Collins, R-Maine.
Sen. John McCain, upon his return from Iraq, defended Bush's build up, contending reinforcements had only just recently been put in place.
"I believe that our military in cooperation with our Iraqi security forces are making progress in a number of areas," he said, noting specifically a dramatic drop in attacks in Ramadi in the western Anbar province.
Reed of Rhode Island, who also visited Iraq last week, said that Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, told him the limits of U.S. military resources will factor into his recommendation on what to do next. "Come next spring, the ability to generate 160,000 soldiers and Marines in country virtually comes to an end," said Reed.
ADVANCE FOR JULY 15; graphic shows number of U.S. aircraft bombings in Iraq since 2006
US President George W. Bush makes his way to board Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC. Bush rejected a new wave of attacks on his Iraq strategy Tuesday, shrugging off a Republican revolt and Democratic demands for troop withdrawals within four months.(AFP/Mandel Ngan)
The President is now in the same box as LBJ was in 1968.
Thats not to say this is ‘another Vietnam’. Its not.
But the fact remains since Bush’s second inaugural he played ‘not to lose’ in Iraq until last November’s ass kicking at the polls.
I couldn’t be more disappointed in his performance this term.
Of course, the Administration will attribute this post to a ‘bigot’ or a ‘racist’ or a ‘vigilante’....(eyes rolling)
like I said in another thread, it’s hard to fight three enemies (terrorists, Dems, and the MSM) and win if you won’t raise a finger against two (the Dems and the MSM) of them. He undermined himself with all the “New Tone” nonsense and it’s come back to bite him.
See you in September, General Paetrausis!
See you in September, General Paetrausis!
Love the man.
‘like I said in another thread, it’s hard to fight three enemies (terrorists, Dems, and the MSM) and win if you won’t raise a finger against two (the Dems and the MSM) of them. He undermined himself with all the “New Tone” nonsense and it’s come back to bite him.’
You forgot its also hard to win a bar fight when you keep breaking bottles on your friends head, as Dubya has been doing for months with those of us that elected him twice.
Outside of that, we’re on the same page.
I agree! I am proud of him, he is strong on terrorism, and I love the President for it!
ap article retitled
White House awaits September Iraq review
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq;_ylt=Akkstfl_SyvM_2B_3Y_LjfSs0NUE
Sunshine senators like Smith and Snowe, Hagel and Collins.
you forgot Domenici, Lugar, Alexander, Warner, Voinovich, and Gregg all of whom hear their knees knocking and are more concerned with their fortunes rather than those of the country.
Oh, but to most on here, McCain is just as disgusting a RINO! < /sarc >
“Reed of Rhode Island, who also visited Iraq last week, said that Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, told him the limits of U.S. military resources will factor into his recommendation on what to do next. ‘Come next spring, the ability to generate 160,000 soldiers and Marines in country virtually comes to an end,’ said Reed.”
Well, that answers the question I posed yesterday when I posted Novak’s column for the day.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1863287/posts
Novak said that we would be running out of troops in nine months. I said, how the heck does he know? Apparently General Petraeus is saying that come spring 2008, we will not be able to maintain the numbers of the surge.
So the surge will be over at that time no matter what anyone wants to do. I sure hope that’s long enough to achieve some stability in Baghdad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.