To: backtothestreets
"I know it's an emotional issue but people need to look at the facts. These men were convicted by a jury of their peers after listening to the facts" as presented by U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, said Bush.
DUH! George, who else might be in need of a pardon? Would an unconvicted person need a pardon? Why?
Bush called Sutton a friend.
Hardly a point of contention, and therein lies the problem. Blackbird.
9 posted on
07/19/2007 5:40:21 PM PDT by
BlackbirdSST
(I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
To: BlackbirdSST
This means the only person he is listening to is Johnny Sutton.
To: BlackbirdSST
Cronyism breeds corruption.
46 posted on
07/19/2007 6:12:42 PM PDT by
Pelham
(Deportation- without it you have amnesty.)
To: BlackbirdSST
These men were convicted by a jury of their peers after listening to the facts" So was Scooter Libby.
What's your point Mr. President???
It's still a miscarriage of justice!!
178 posted on
07/19/2007 8:05:26 PM PDT by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.)
To: BlackbirdSST
DUH! George, who else might be in need of a pardon? Would an unconvicted person need a pardon? Why?
Ask Nixon.
346 posted on
07/20/2007 11:34:56 PM PDT by
yahoo
(Illegal immigrants, by definitions, are criminals. They should be treated as such.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson