Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinosaurs, early relatives coexisted
sfgate.com ^ | Friday, July 20, 2007 | David Perlman, Chronicle Science Editor

Posted on 07/20/2007 12:30:45 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp

UC Berkeley scientists, digging deep into a remote New Mexico hillside, have discovered a trove of fossil bones that they say is evidence that dinosaurs and their early relatives lived side by side for tens of millions of years before the relatives slowly died off and left the dinosaurs to dominate the ancient world.

Until now many scientists had thought that dinosaur "precursors" -- perhaps their ancestors -- disappeared suddenly long before the dinosaurs themselves rose to prominence, but the bones dug up by Berkeley paleontologists show evidence of a different story.

The discovery of a wide variety of creatures all mingled together in layer upon layer of rocks dating from Earth's late Triassic period between 235 million and 200 million years ago, they say, shows that the strange relatives of the dinosaurs remained on the scene while the dinosaurs evolved into truly dominant creatures during the Jurassic period, between 120 million and 200 million years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: crevo; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-324 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek
I'd be very surprised if human aging weren't under serious assault, if not completely conquered, by the time 2107 rolled around.

Just what we need, a Hillary!™ that won't ever die...

161 posted on 07/20/2007 5:22:08 PM PDT by null and void (We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

When all the smaller “relatives” died off (I wonder why) what then, did the big guys eat; Garbanzo beans?


162 posted on 07/20/2007 5:23:37 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

Forage.


163 posted on 07/20/2007 5:24:19 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Overturned rolloff from KFC.


164 posted on 07/20/2007 5:25:12 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Breeding out or up, I wonder?


165 posted on 07/20/2007 5:26:35 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
I am no evolutionist, but your “ballistic proof” is fool hardy at best, like Bart Sebral’s “we never landed on the moon” hooey.

God gave us serious minds to understand a serious and complex universe. Nothing “came from earth” and made craters on the moon.

166 posted on 07/20/2007 5:27:02 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Wait until you get an AHAYCP.


167 posted on 07/20/2007 5:28:05 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
I can't disagree with that.

Although I like these evolution arguments purely for entertainment value,
As far a science is concerned, I can shrug my shoulders and say we are only discovering what God already made, and leave it at that.

We are unlocking the mysteries of our biological nature and are at a point now where we can manipulate it, perhaps to our own undoing if we don't proceed with extreme caution.

The potential to unlock a biological disaster is very real. We've already seen the potential danger of how a mutation can cross the species barrier and have the potential to wipe out all those susceptible to that DNA sequence (prionic diseases).

We have to be careful.

168 posted on 07/20/2007 5:29:17 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
We have to be careful.

And very wise.

And very, very lucky.

169 posted on 07/20/2007 5:33:38 PM PDT by null and void (We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
"Nothing “came from earth” and made craters on the moon."

And you have proof, right? Thought NOT.

There is plenty of reason to suspect bits of the earth's crust were blasted out of earths atmosphere and formed comets and debri and either collided with other bodies in this system or returned home to rest.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Shot at 2007-07-20

170 posted on 07/20/2007 5:49:28 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
You are kidding, right. Shot 7-20-07? That cartoon supposed to be live film?

Parts of the Earth were influx at the instant of creation when it formed, but what about now? What of asteroids.

Of course all this is irrelevant, here you go, observed Leonid Meteors hit the Moon in 1999:

http://www.space-frontier.org/Projects/Moon/lunarscience.html

Why is it that some Christians are afraid of science, so much so that the make some mighty big leaps in trying to explain things that need no explanation other than what was observed or studied. Nothing in observed science contradicts anything in the Bible.

The majesty of God’s creation is revealed more and more every day by our science. It is much more than some 6000 year old place with painted stars full of tricks to make us think it is much older. If he wanted simple he would have skipped free will and making us anything but automatons under his power.

The more we understand the depth and scope of the intricate mechanisms and physical wonders that abound around us, how truly awe inspiring and absolutely powerful God becomes to his belivers. That is a God I want to worship, not some Houdini playing tricks to make us look foolish and small.

One last thing, you tone in these messages is a bit over the top to be honest so I question your true positions and motives.

171 posted on 07/20/2007 6:10:41 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Why is it that some Christians are afraid of science, so much so that the make some mighty big leaps in trying to explain things that need no explanation other than what was observed or studied. Nothing in observed science contradicts anything in the Bible.

A global flood ca. 4350 years ago has not been found by archaeologists or sedimentologists.

172 posted on 07/20/2007 6:48:39 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Who is They?


173 posted on 07/20/2007 6:51:17 PM PDT by RFC_Gal (It's not just a boulder; It's a rock! A ro-o-ock. The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

It’s only ZERO proof if you ignore all the libraries full of information that doesn’t agree with your personal views...


174 posted on 07/20/2007 6:52:25 PM PDT by RFC_Gal (It's not just a boulder; It's a rock! A ro-o-ock. The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

I don’t suppose these geniuses consided a major tectonic event cause different strata to be jumbled together.


175 posted on 07/20/2007 7:12:44 PM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

What is that supposed to be?


176 posted on 07/20/2007 7:15:01 PM PDT by FixedandDilated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Another bogus story designed to test our faith. The earth is only 9,000 years old.

A quaint idea. But wrong. My conservative Catholic family of seven is taught the truth, Evolution happens.

177 posted on 07/20/2007 7:18:57 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst
The bones were all together because they all drown together in God’s flood, and then all settled in the cave together..as the water receeded ...easy.

And yet another fairy tale.

178 posted on 07/20/2007 7:20:30 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Are you any kin to the Ed Zachary that they named that ugly disease after?
179 posted on 07/20/2007 7:30:03 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ping-Pong
In chapter 1 God created the animals and mankind (not Adam). In chapter 2 He created Adam and the domestic animals (to till the ground).

So adam wasn't the first man?

180 posted on 07/20/2007 7:47:44 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson