Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The KG9 Kid

For those very reasons you stated about the distinctions between today’s game and that of the Ruth era, Ruth was a far more accomplished player and record-setter than any of the moderns.

Even if admitting of the poor pitching you claim from his era, Ruth’s contemporaries had all those same advantages you mentioned, yet none came close to his feats. In the modern era, Bonds is no where near the exponentially better player that Ruth was in his day.


153 posted on 08/06/2007 4:15:53 PM PDT by nicollo (you're freakin' out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: nicollo
Ruth was just a power-slugger. He was also a strikeout king and an on-balls walker. He belonged to a magnificent team.

No disrespect to Babe Ruth, but his legend and fan base worship made him out to be lots more than he really was. I'm not sure that I agree that he was a particularly accomplished player outside the obvious talent he was best remembered for.

162 posted on 08/06/2007 6:22:32 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: nicollo
Even if admitting of the poor pitching you claim from his era, Ruth’s contemporaries had all those same advantages you mentioned, yet none came close to his feats.

Babe Ruth, as I recall, was a hell of a pitcher too (when he was pitching)

174 posted on 08/06/2007 7:54:44 PM PDT by torchthemummy (Democrat's Support Of The Military: "Invincible In Peace-Invisible In War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson