[George from New England]

Isn’t it time to stop the excessive spending just to protect THE GUILTY. Where was the effort made in the prior time to keep the predators behind bars and fulfill the states moral obligation to protect THE INNOCENT?

If some third party is going to go after the guilty, do we really care?

There are ALREADY LAWS against the third party committing a crime, but why all the enforcement expenditures to protect these two?

The state picks and chooses the laws worth putting law enforcement protection efforts into. Protect the accused and forget the innocent.

[Doe Eyes]

Isn’t it time to stop the excessive spending just to protect THE GUILTY.

So you think if they are GUILTY, we skip all this court nonsense, jury trials, and just execute them?

[LurkedLongEnough]

First law to enforce: individuals’ right to keep and bear arms.