No foetus can beatus.
Kill babies but not Islamic Fadscists?p> Kill Jews but not Arabs?p> Kill Republicans but not Dems?p> Hillary has a Krystal Nacht somewhere in her make up.
I did not have sex with that woman!
Posted on 08/14/2007 4:13:23 PM PDT by wagglebee
It would be A LOT worse!
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
So, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" don't factor into it, for She Who Must Not Be Named...
Then the GOP needs to try a whole lot harder to pretend to be conservative.
It would just balance what China is doing, because she would demand aborting MALE fetuses.
Sounds like she's thrown down the gauntlet to God.
Her nastiness would crank up the baby grinders more than ever.
Abortion...before or after birth? Or both? Or both, but the latter mandatory only for conservatives?
No foetus can beatus.
Kill babies but not Islamic Fadscists?p> Kill Jews but not Arabs?p> Kill Republicans but not Dems?p> Hillary has a Krystal Nacht somewhere in her make up.
I did not have sex with that woman!
Obviously, she is referring to SCOTUS appointments. Shows how much at stake in this upcoming election.
I don’t believe that there is anyone on the Right or the Left that does not anticipate a President Hillary would budget substantial tax payer funds to promoting and funding abortion. Planned Parenthood? would be a major beneficiary of public money. And just like with the with Fairness Doctrine, abortion opponents would be muzzled by Federal authorities.
Question to be asked by Bill Plante..
“Uh, Senator Clinton! How old were you when you had your first abortion?”
My advice would be: Don’t mess with God. He’s the real deal. And you thought Bill was.
“Reproductive freedom” - I’m so sick of transparent, politically correct liberal speak that I could hurl.
I’m pretty sure that Hitlery’s only heterosexual encounter produced Chelsea.
lucky for the Beast the thing that spawned her didn't have that option or she just might of ended up a few grisly bits in a bag someplace.
Hillary would promote abortion on a large scale. She would also promote euthanasia, the natural next eventual step in that scenario.
And national health care to give the government more control over the populace, and to raise taxes up the gazoo.
Also, if you think Bush is negligent on border patrol, you ain’t seen nuthin yet! The entire country would go under the auspices of the UN, with Hubby Bill the head of the UN!
She's still a bag of gritsle.
Ummm, no she wouldn’t. She would like to, but she won’t be able to accomplish that lofty goal of the Left.
The simple reason is that because the majority of Americans are decent, fair-minded people.
If either extreme of either party ever managed to implement it’s full agenda, there would be open revolt in this country. Therefore: Do not despair of a President Hilary for she can do no more than affect American life in very small ways, and always at the margins. The damage she might do will only be temporary, domestically.
I’d be more afraid of a President Hilary performing a repeat of her husband’s asdministration and subordinating American foreign policy to the UN and European Union.
THAT frightens me in a world full of Al-Queda’s.
i heard that...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.