[uncbob]

Your implication was that it was Agiprop

[Billthedrill]

It is agitprop. It's propaganda designed to agitate, to cause heightened emotions, specifically between the U.K. and the U.S. I'm accusing the Times of putting out an issue that was deliberately designed to accentuate hard feelings between the two countries in an effort to swing the opinions of the respective parties away from one another.

This would be forgivable were we not involved in a shooting war. As it is, I strongly believe there ought to be some guilty consciences on that editorial board for delivering such a biased, inflammatory point of view. Did you catch one of the other columns in the same issue, with the headline "General Betreaus"? Betray Us. Cute. Not real subtle, that...