Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosierpearl
I really want to vote for Fred.

This is the major distinction between '08, '00 and '04 (and even '96). The Dems threw Gore and Lurch at us and we had no choice but to vote for whoever ran against them. It was Mr. Compassionate.

This isn't going to happen this time around. Conservatives will now be voting "FOR" a candidate, rather than 'against' a Shillary. And they are screwed, and here's why: Affection toward a candidate is contagious. Those around you will note the sincerity that you exude toward Fred.

Nothing could be further from the truth surrounding Hillary. There's no affection. Only gamesmanship- first woman president. Novel, but not everlasting. And certainly nothing approaching what could be considered 'affection'.

129 posted on 08/21/2007 7:20:05 PM PDT by budwiesest (I survived crossing the Folsom Rainbow bridge (built in1917) today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: budwiesest

Well stated. IMHO, the conventional wisdom that is mired in the 2000/2004 electoral map will be turned on it’s ear. Fred is a much stronger candidate than Bush was.


134 posted on 08/21/2007 8:03:17 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (President Hunter should appoint Senator Katherine Harris to his cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson