Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian Troops Cross Into Iraq, Attack Villages
ContraCostaTimes ^ | August 24, 2007

Posted on 08/25/2007 6:02:20 AM PDT by Fennie

BAGHDAD -- Iranian soldiers crossed into Iraq and attacked several small villages in the northeastern Kurdish region, local officials said. U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said he couldn't confirm the attacks, but five Kurdish officials said that troops had infiltrated Iraqi territory and fired on villages.

The Iranian military regularly exchanges artillery and rocket fire with Kurdish rebels who have taken refuge across the border, but Iraqi Kurdish officials worried that Iran's willingness to cross the border raises the possibility of a broader confrontation that would draw the Iraqi government and U.S. forces into an unwanted showdown.

Details of the incursion were sparse. Abdul Wahid Gwany, the mayor of Choman, a village 250 miles north of Baghdad, said Iranian troops crossed the border in 10 places and traveled about three miles into the mountainous Iraqi region, bombing rural villages in the process. He didn't say how many Iranian troops were involved.

Jamal Ahmed, the police chief of Benjawin, a village a little more than 200 miles north of Baghdad, said the attacks killed some residents. "We don't know the amount of casualties as the bombing was continuous and so severe," Ahmed said. Gwany said the attacks killed many cattle and left villages and farms burned to the ground...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraniantroops; iraq; islam; kurdistan; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2007 6:02:21 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Uniformed Iranian troops invading Iraqi Kurdistan and attacking our allies. Is this now Act of War enough to bomb them into oblivion!?


2 posted on 08/25/2007 6:04:46 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
possibility of a broader confrontation that would draw the Iraqi government and U.S. forces into an unwanted showdown

Unwanted by whom?

3 posted on 08/25/2007 6:06:11 AM PDT by Edgerunner (If you won't let the military fight your battles, you will have to. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Here is what could come next: Iranian Soldiers cross Iraqi border in Kurdish village, and take X US Troops hostage.


4 posted on 08/25/2007 6:06:45 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

If true..................................


5 posted on 08/25/2007 6:07:08 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
The only question is when does the U.S. go into Iran?
6 posted on 08/25/2007 6:30:36 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Pres. Achmenajob-a-doba-do really wants a war with the US. He sees it as his destiny to 'kill' the great satan.
But is trying to goad us into striking so he can claim, " they started it".
7 posted on 08/25/2007 6:43:46 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Vinnie, you misspelled his name he correct spelling is Amagonastatajihad.


8 posted on 08/25/2007 6:49:46 AM PDT by TLEIBY308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

The more talk about US leaving, the bolder Iran becomes. She intends to take over Iraq, and won’t that be swell.


9 posted on 08/25/2007 6:51:44 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
From The Guardian, August 18, 2006

"[Villagers] told the Guardian yesterday that at least six villages had been abandoned and one person had died following a sustained artillery barrage by Iranian forces that appeared designed to flush out guerrillas linked to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), who have hideouts in Iraq."

The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization internationally by a number of states and organizations, including the USA, NATO and the EU.

I'll be damned if I want U.S. forces to fight to defend Marxist PKK terrorists!

The area along the northern border is PKK territory. The Kurd regional government does not have control there -- maybe they don't even want control there. It's their call.

10 posted on 08/25/2007 6:57:55 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
This is but a taste of things to come if the Democrats have their way.

The tunnel-visioned (and navel-gazing) Democrats have been stuck on stupid since 1949.

Truman was president when we freed S. Korea from the Japanese in 1945

Then, Truman pulled our troops out of a militarily and politically weak S. Korea in 1949.

When S. Korea was invaded by North Korea in the following year, Truman sent troops back to S. Korea.

8,000 Americans died in the first 3 months of the Korean War.

30,000 Americans died in Korea in 30 months of Truman's presidency.

They would not have died, if Truman's administration hadn't abandoned the newly created Republic of Korea in 1949.

11 posted on 08/25/2007 7:02:42 AM PDT by syriacus (If the US troops had remained in S. Korea in 1949, there would have been no Korean War (1950-53))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLEIBY308
correct spelling is Amagonastatajihad

I believe it is Amagonagetamybuttkicked

12 posted on 08/25/2007 7:08:05 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

The “PKK” in Iran (and Iran bordering areas) is PJAK. They are ideologically different from the PKK in and near Turkey.

PJAK has moved from their leftist past towards an more centrist, pro-federalist, liberal (in the classical sense, not in the US sense) position. They shouldn’t be thrown into the same bowl as the “Turkey” PKK.

Their alleged “socialist” background shouldn’t be much of an issue, since even the two great Kurdish parties (PUK, KDP) in the Authonomy were originally leftist, socialist and social-democratic. However since the cooperation with the USA they have moved towards capitalism.

Anyway since the stated goal of PJAK is the overthrow of the Islamic Regime in Iran, we SHOULD consider them a valuable ally. We have few others.


13 posted on 08/25/2007 7:15:49 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
I'll be damned if I want U.S. forces to fight to defend Marxist PKK terrorists!

It is a dilemma. How about if we just use air power to destroy the invading Iranians just because they're where they aren't supposed to be rather than consider it defending the Communist PKK?

It's the job of Iraq to be going up there and whacking the PKK in their country not that of Iranians.

When they're both enemies both should be destroyed. Iran is our job, the Commies are the job of our allies Iraq.

14 posted on 08/25/2007 7:20:04 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner

By Iran and Liberals everywhere.


15 posted on 08/25/2007 7:21:11 AM PDT by wastedyears (Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C210N

I don’t think Kurds are beleivable. Their intent is a war that will result in a bigger independant Kurdistan.


16 posted on 08/25/2007 7:21:11 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Hillary's color is yellow.....how appropriate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

You have put your finger on what I think is going to become an ever-increasing problem, perhaps to the degree of the “palestinian”/Palestine” problem. From the git, the Kurds and their nation were divided by the arbitrary border-drawing whims of the same folks who at the same time also drew the “palestine” borders. The overall Kurd matter is redux of those borders. Plus, of course, the oilfields that were found to be within the former borders of what was the Kurd nation. Although the “iraqi” Kurds have been our ally in this so far, it would indeed be prudent to keep in mind the adage “enemy of my enemy”.


17 posted on 08/25/2007 7:22:51 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

You have any sources supporting your contention? I’d be pleased to update my understanding of matters in Kurdistan.


18 posted on 08/25/2007 7:24:51 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
but Iraqi Kurdish officials worried that Iran's willingness to cross the border raises the possibility of a broader confrontation that would draw the Iraqi government and U.S. forces into an unwanted showdown.

The ContraCosta Times is clearly trying to sell their anti-war koolaide. This give us the perfect opportunity and PERMISSION to engage Iran.

19 posted on 08/25/2007 7:27:03 AM PDT by right wing (The Drive-By Media Are Terrorists Too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
raises the possibility of a broader confrontation that would draw the Iraqi government and U.S. forces into an unwanted showdown.

WHAT!? And offend the TURKS?

Where do these guys get this stuff?


20 posted on 08/25/2007 7:29:27 AM PDT by tailgunner (USMC KoreaEra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson