[Nathan Zachary]

And as for your claim "Arabic speakers speaking in a non-theological or non-Muslim context use the word in its original and general meaning of ‘struggle’."
that's pure hogwash. That's exactly what some Islamic apologists say however, and it had been argued and shown to be hogwash many times over.

[The_Reader_David]

Don’t tell me what’s hogwash. I personally know Christian Arabic speakers. Do you? Do you know anyone who speaks Arabic?

Lying about Arabic does not advance the resistance to the false teachings of Mohammed. It only makes the liar look like a stupid bigot, thereby harming the cause by making it easier for the Muslims to portray their opponents as rubes or racists who hate all Arabs regardless of creed.

Stick to showing that Islam is a political ideology cloaked in a religion that needs to be resisted for the sake of Western Civilization and any understanding of freedom, right or left, and stop exhibiting your ignorance of foreign languages as if it somehow helped the cause of resisting the Jihad. (By the way, capitalizing it in transliteration, particularly with the definite article does fix it as having the Muslim theological sense.)