Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican group demands halt to trucking program
Associated Press ^ | Sep.13, 2007 | LISA J. ADAMS

Posted on 09/13/2007 4:28:50 PM PDT by Dubya

MEXICO CITY — The private organization representing the majority of the country's freight haulers today demanded the government suspend a pilot cross-border trucking program because they said Mexican truckers are at a competitive disadvantage with their U.S. counterparts.

Tirso Martinez, president of the group known by its Spanish acronym Canacar, said the one-year pilot program, which went into effect last week, is destined to fail because Mexico's Transportation Department has failed to resolve traffic bottlenecks for Mexican trucks trying to cross the U.S. border, and does not have the personnel to enforce a provision prohibiting U.S. truckers from carrying domestic Mexican cargo, among other issues.

Although Mexican cargo haulers have invested $2.2 billion in their industry and created 54,000 new jobs in the past year, "the Mexican government has not negotiated the conditions that will permit freight haulers to compete on equal terms with its counterparts in the United States," Martinez told a news conference.

"Therefore, we demand that the Transportation Department suspend the launch of this pilot program ... because it is not prepared to carry it out."

Martinez said Canacar was requesting a meeting with President Felipe Calderon to discuss its concerns and also would like to meet with state governors and lawmakers in an effort to "define concrete goals and specific timeframes to resolve both internal and external problems."

In addition to the news conference, the association today published in at least two daily newspapers an open letter to Calderon, Transportation Secretary Luis Tellez, and the national Congress spelling out its concerns.

The association's protest comes two days after the U.S. Senate approved a proposal by Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan, of North Dakota, to prohibit the U.S. Transportation Department from spending money on the pilot program, which ostensibly would be followed by a permanent program mandated by the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Dorgan's proposal is part of a $106 billion transportation and housing spending bill that the Senate plans to vote on soon. The House of Representatives approved a similar provision to Dorgan's in July as part of its version of the transportation spending bill.

The Teamsters, which have participated in protests against the program at the border in the U.S., argue that Mexican trucks are not safe for U.S. highways.

Both the U.S. and Mexican governments have argued that conditions are adequate to launch the pilot program, which they said would make Mexican cargo shipments more efficient both in terms of cost and time.

Until last week, Mexican trucks were restricted to a commercial border zone stretching about 25 miles inside the United States, except in Arizona, where it extended 75 miles.

From inside the zone, truckers transfer their goods to U.S. trucks, which then haul the cargo the rest of the way. U.S. truck drivers who have carved themselves a niche in that market have said they are worried about going out of business.

At least one Mexican truck has taken part in the pilot program thus far: A freightliner from northern Mexican company Transportes Olympic delivered a shipment of steel to North Carolina earlier this week.


TOPICS: Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mexicantrucks; mexico; mmexicantrucks; nafta; trucks

1 posted on 09/13/2007 4:28:54 PM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Disadvantage? Not having to conform to any rules is a disadvantage?


2 posted on 09/13/2007 4:30:38 PM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Interesting. When do the truckloads of illegal aliens start?


3 posted on 09/13/2007 4:31:22 PM PDT by RightWhale (Stop Change while it is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

bush is deeply saddened.


4 posted on 09/13/2007 4:32:12 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I figured that ‘disadvantage’ was code for they were getting special advantages. I could be wrong.


5 posted on 09/13/2007 4:32:57 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
Mexico's Transportation Department has failed to resolve traffic bottlenecks for Mexican trucks trying to cross the U.S. border, and does not have the personnel to enforce a provision prohibiting U.S. truckers from carrying domestic Mexican cargo, among other issues.

Yes, heaven forbid that US truckers could carry Mexican cargo!

6 posted on 09/13/2007 4:38:37 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

we are carrying them in every other area. Why not their cargo!?


7 posted on 09/13/2007 4:44:14 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde

bingo.


8 posted on 09/13/2007 4:44:53 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde; GOP Poet
Should have read:

I figured that ‘disadvantage’ was code for they were not getting special advantages. I could be wrong.

It was a blonde moment.

9 posted on 09/13/2007 4:49:07 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

“DISADVANTAGE? Our trucks don’t have no stinking DISADVANTAGE!!!”


10 posted on 09/13/2007 5:14:41 PM PDT by aroostook war
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
a provision prohibiting U.S. truckers from carrying domestic Mexican cargo

I reckon there's little chance of that.

I speak with plenty of drivers. To a person they have said they don't want to drive in Mexico. They literally fear for their lives.

11 posted on 09/13/2007 5:34:28 PM PDT by upchuck (The President has an Agenda, and it's not promoting The Land of the Free and The Home of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

1970.


12 posted on 09/13/2007 5:49:33 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet; AuntB
"Why not their cargo"

NAFTA allows only international freight.

US trucks can't haul interstate(domestic) in Mexico and Mexican trucks can't haul interstate(domestic) in the US.

Martinez is saying that if Mexico lets the US trucks in, the US truckers will break the rules and start hauling within Mexico.

Where have I heard that before?

13 posted on 09/13/2007 6:05:01 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Right


14 posted on 09/13/2007 6:35:40 PM PDT by freekitty (May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde

LOL (from one blonde to another)—I read it the way you intended. :-)


15 posted on 09/13/2007 6:57:24 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Apologies - I just posted this article, but did a search, even with the author’s name. Sorry. :-o


16 posted on 09/13/2007 11:57:09 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson