[alicewonders]

One would have expected the word “no” at some point in her response. It appears to me that she is, in effect, lying.

If her lips are moving, she is lying/pandering. She doesn't want to say NO and then offend her gay constituency. She doesn't want to say YES and offend those few dems that might be offended by that.

I do think her hatred of men shows loud and clear on her face.

[weegee]

If her lips are moving, she is lying/pandering. She doesn't want to say NO and then offend her gay constituency. She doesn't want to say YES and offend those few dems that might be offended by that.

The dirty little secret is that the Democrats have repeatedly use the gay card to try to turn off voters.

Foleygate included no crimes but he was hounded out of office.

The toe tapper's biggest crime was "disorderly conduct" while we have people who've taken bribes in office.

And of course there was John Edwards' introducing Dick Cheney's daughter into the 2004 debate.

[trisham]

She doesn't want to say NO and then offend her gay constituency. She doesn't want to say YES and offend those few dems that might be offended by that. I do think her hatred of men shows loud and clear on her face.

*************

Agreed.

She appears to be openly courting the lesbian vote, while weakly denying the rumours about her own leanings. Even if she were to be exposed, I don't think she believes it would hurt her. She's already relying primarily on the votes of women, and if she is truly confused about her sexual identity, she may believe other women share the same antipathy toward men.