Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accusations from Paris that Iran is building a military nuclear plant south of Natanz [Debka]
Debka | September 28, 2007 | Debka

Posted on 09/28/2007 4:40:11 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo

The latest round of the international campaign against Iran’s covert nuclear activities is coming out of Paris, DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources report. A statement by President Nicolas Sarkozy Thursday, Sept. 27 that he does not believe Iran’s program is peaceful was followed by a press conference at which the National Council of Resistance of Iran’s chairman, Mehdi Abrishamchi, reported Iran was constructing a new site for a secret military project 5 km south of the Natanz nuclear complex.

Sarkozy’s spokesman David Martinon said: “Ahmadinejad claims his country’s nuclear activities are peaceful. Ultimately, we do not believe him. Everyone knows that the program has military goals. We have a string of clues leading us to that conclusion. The question is not settled.” DEBKAfile notes that, five years ago, the Americans used the same roundabout technique for making their first disclosures of Iran’s nuclear violations.

They fed the revelation that uranium enrichment was taking place at Natanz to the same resistance group, NCRI (Mujahideen Qalq), which then called a press conference in Washington and laid it before the public. Surprisingly, this time, Tehran made its own contribution to the disclosures. The local newspaper Kayhan stated on Sept. 25: “The intelligence that the West currently has on Iran’s nuclear program is limited to sites accessible to IAEA inspectors – and more than that they do not know.”

Two days later, the NCRI went before the press in Paris with the little information he had, which nonetheless substantiated Tehran’s admission. Iran is apparently bracing for a fresh spate of international allegations and disclosures from intelligence sources about its most secret nuclear activities for military purposes.

Abrishamchi’s seeming first installment did not specify what was going on at the new site or the nature of its contribution to Iran’s weapons program.

He located it near the small village of Abbas-Abad 5 km south of Natanz in the Siah mountain. The site, he said, consisted of a sprawling underground area with two tunnels which run under two mountains connected to Natanz. The tunnel entrance is six meters wide. Building began in 2006 and is scheduled to end in March 2008. Revolutionary Guards Brig. Gen. Tabatabi monitors progress of the work every week; it is overseen by his deputy Brig. Gen. Daneshjo.

To preserve the project’s secrecy, the NCRI chairman reported, its various sections were assigned to different agencies and units of the defense ministry and Revolutionary Guards, none of which has the whole picture. DEBKAfile’s sources believe that just enough data were rationed out to Abrishamchi to let the Iranians know that US and French intelligence has a lot more. How much more is released will depend on Tehran’s reaction. If the clerical rulers continue to maintain like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that their program is purely for peaceful purposes and the issue is closed, more solid information on Iranian illicit undertakings is likely to be laid bare.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france; iran; nuclear; sarkozy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Fitzcarraldo

Its a ZSU-23-2. Definately designed for anti-aircraft, but no aircaft dropping a penetrator would be within range. Given the guard towers in the background and its placement on the perimeter I’d say these are supporting heavy weapons against ground assault.


21 posted on 09/28/2007 6:37:16 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Nice opportunity to try out the Rods from God if we only had them yet.
22 posted on 09/28/2007 7:04:55 PM PDT by One_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Just a question from someone who has never been a grunt/ground pounder but...

Why would you put an air-defense weapon on the perimeter? Being on the perimeter exposes it to direct fire from outside the wire.

Wouldn't a ZSU-23 have the range to defend well from well within the compound? Or does it have an alternate use, can it be depressed enough to take out ground targets?

I'm not questioning the ID of the weapon - just what were they thinking with the placement.

23 posted on 09/28/2007 7:17:26 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

I think they are likely there predominantly to engage ground targets. The perimeter gives them an open field of fire.

Its not an issue of range, but seeing your target. The perimeter is generally cleared of obstructions and an attacking force would have to cover a lot of open ground. Although an old school weapon, the ZSU-23 would be fearsome weapon to have to contend with if you had no armor.

I’m thinking JDAMs would be the best preventive medicine, but that would give away the element of surprise.


24 posted on 09/28/2007 7:58:38 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

It’s amazing how the riots lit a fire under the French’s ass, both literally and figuratively...


25 posted on 09/28/2007 10:05:20 PM PDT by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson