Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican book on Templars' demise
BBC ^ | October 5, 2007

Posted on 10/05/2007 1:44:55 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
To: mamelukesabre

I wouldn’t trust anything the Vatican says about the Knights Templar.


41 posted on 10/05/2007 2:35:31 PM PDT by cerberus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bert

The Vatican DID NOT EXTERMINATE the Templars. They were arrested and tortured by the French at the orders of the French king. Those Templars who lived outside of France were largely untouched.

This why Templars survived as an order even somewhat after the dissolution at Vienne. Read: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=10&mcid=3&pid=29039


42 posted on 10/05/2007 2:36:33 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Why does that matter? A pope, any pope, must suffer the same fate if revenge is the goal.


43 posted on 10/05/2007 2:37:09 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Only 799 copies? Shoot, guess it won’t be available on Amazon. :->

No, but there's always E-Bay!

44 posted on 10/05/2007 2:39:18 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

You wrote:

“But it was known the whole life of that Pope.”

Who said that? No one. What is being claimed is that it is obvious to MODERN observers that the Templars were innocent based on this one document. That doesn’t mean that the pope believed they were innocent.

“The Pope here, appears to have a sin of omission.”

Then, according to your logic, you might be committing a sin of ommission because you are omitting obvious points here. This is what the article actually said:

“The official who found the paper says it exonerates the knights entirely.”

Okay, so the MODERN OFFICIAL believes it exonerates the Templars. What did the pope believe?

“In the hearings before Clement V, the knights reportedly admitted spitting on the cross, denying Jesus and kissing the lower back of the man proposing them during initiation ceremonies.”

What makes you think the pope was hiding something then?


45 posted on 10/05/2007 2:43:30 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

You wrote:

“occultic Masonic”

“Oxymoron.”

More like, “Redundant”.


46 posted on 10/05/2007 2:45:25 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Why did the Catholic church allow a falsehood to exist for 700 years?

700 years is pretty swift for the Vatican.

That's practically yesterday.
47 posted on 10/05/2007 2:46:00 PM PDT by rock_lobsta (It's October... Buy Popcorn from a Scout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

You wrote:

“You are correct. And the vatican went along with it because the great wealth of the Knights had made them a threat to the Church.”

No. The Church, overall, was more wealthy than the Templars could ever dream of being. Also, wealth simply wasn’t a threat to the Church in any case. The Church supported the French King for essentially four reasons: 1) the Church was trying to heal the wound left by the battle between King Philip and Pope Boniface VIII, 2) popes of the Avignon period were not only physically close to France (too close!) but were dependent upon the good graces of the French (they could not go back to Rome), 3) the popes of the period were French as was Philip, 4) the Templars looked guilty as sin.


48 posted on 10/05/2007 2:49:45 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
the King of France decided he didn’t want to pay back all the money he had borrowed off them. So, with the tacit consent of the Vatican, he butchered a bunch of them

Exactly. These were powerful men, and the crowned heads of state did not relish being in their debt.

49 posted on 10/05/2007 2:49:47 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
Sounds like a Mel Gibson Production.

I was just thinking how great it would be if Gibson created an epic
about the Templar Knights. 4-hours would be perfect..

50 posted on 10/05/2007 2:50:20 PM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

“His last words were, “Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us - God will avenge us.”

“The chilling irony of the conclusion of this story is that Jacques DeMolay’s final words did, in fact, come true. Pope Clement V died only a month later on April 20th (he is suspected of having cancer of the bowel) and Philip IV was killed while on a hunting trip on November 29th 1314. True to the claim both men did indeed die within the year of Jacques DeMolay’s own death.”

I think he got his revenge...


51 posted on 10/05/2007 2:52:55 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

The pope at the time, Clement V, was a Frenchman, but there was only one pope. From this time until the 1370s the popes lived in Avignon. The Great Schism was later, after Gregory XI returned to Rome and died there and Urban VI was elected but antagonized his cardinals so they claimed to have elected him under duress and chose someone else to be pope. Urban VI and his successors in Rome are now regarded as the legitimate popes, and the rival popes who lived in Avignon after 1378 are considered antipopes. That situation lasted until about 1415.


52 posted on 10/05/2007 3:06:47 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

“If you read the article, it says the proof of their exoneration was misfiled and only just found”

I think they were found along side the FBI files and the Rose law firm billing records.

So many clerical erors, so little time.


53 posted on 10/05/2007 3:30:34 PM PDT by Carbonado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blam; SunkenCiv

Possible ping!


54 posted on 10/05/2007 3:48:48 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

An ancestor of mine was in the order although I don’t think he was caught up with its demise.

We need them again.


55 posted on 10/05/2007 3:51:33 PM PDT by rbosque ("To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." - Teddy Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
DeMolay was buned on Fri. 13 which became the basis for the superstition of that day being bad luck.

I did not realize this; thanks for the posting.

56 posted on 10/05/2007 3:51:59 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Who has a dog in this fight? Freemasons for sure.

A story of this type will bring a flood of Freemasons to the fore. Especially, the Knights Templar Masons and the Order of DeMolay, after all their name is taken from the Demolay of this story.

The Roman Catholics and Freemasons have been crossways with each other for centuries over this.

No doubt, there will be many Masons posting on this claiming their hero has been vindicated. Trouble is, you’ll never know they are Masons. Most of them won’t identify themselves as such.


57 posted on 10/05/2007 3:52:44 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Soooo, who does the movie?

Does it matter? They will skew it whatever way they so choose without separating fact from fantasy. Read the book for accuracy and skip the movie as fiction.

58 posted on 10/05/2007 3:54:15 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thanks for the ping.


59 posted on 10/05/2007 3:54:45 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ELS
Thank you for the additonal research!

the new volume is "a previously unpublished and exclusive edition of the complete acts of the original hearing against the Knights Templar."

One can only imagine what else is buried in these archives.

60 posted on 10/05/2007 3:57:44 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson