Posted on 10/13/2007 11:23:02 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
Hasta La Vista, baybee!!! (snort!, snort!, snort!)
(Is Sean really a conservative?)
No, he’s a Republican. There IS a difference.
Speaking out of both sides of his “1st.Amendment mouth”. A true liberal trait(or).
As a sworn member of the Knights of Columbus it would have been my duty to thump him had I been in that studio.
He’s conservative on foreign policy...and he’s from lite republican to lite liberal on social and economic policy.
“No, he’s a Republican.”
Yes.
Yep. Like all those other great Republicans: Schwarzenegger, Giuliani, Arlen Specter, Chuck Lugar, Lincoln Chafee, Jim Jeffords...
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — California has become the first state to prohibit landlords from asking tenants about their immigration status... The law signed this week by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenneger...
Why is an article that is more than one year old being posted as current news?
Obviously not true for anyone even remotely familiar with him.
*smacks self* Good grief, I didn't even look at the date of the article...my bad. Thank you. I thought Sean was going to attend a future fundraiser.
Nope. This was a fundraiser for Arnold vs. Phil Angelides from back in 2006. The battle lines had already been drawn. Ol’ Sparky does this kind of thing a lot to intentionally mislead people - it’s very dishonest.
“(Is Sean really a conservative?)”
No. Hannity is a pathetic cheerleader for anything GOP. Just listen to him kiss Rino Rudy’s behind. That mancrush is pathetic.
Because he claims to be a conservative while supporting liberals off the air and encouraging his audience to vote for them on the air.
Few people are doing more harm to the conservative movement than Hannity.
LOL
Why do you parade as a conservative, when you are really just trying to divide conservatives? That’s all you have ever done here, and it is getting tiresome for you to continue these lies. You post an article out of the blue for no reason from more than a year ago as current news, and it was Arnold v. Angelides, not in a primary.
The topic here is Hannity's faulty strategy of supporting liberal Republicans. It's been a disaster in the case of Schwarzenegger and there is every reason to putting Giuliani in office will be the same sort of disaster.
But, I get the feeling you're the type that loves to see RINOs elected to office.
"My allegiance is not to you power-hungry, power-grabbing politicians in Washington," Hannity said. "My allegiance is to my audience, not you. It's frankly disgusting what you Republicans in Congress have done. You deserve these numbers." He urged them to stop calling with complaints, saying "you guys are pathetic." He continued: "How can anybody turn around and turn on people like me who supported you and helped put you in power. I might as well support Ted Kennedy. You've been pathetically weak in your leadership. You stand for nothing." He criticized Republicans' failure on the war on terror; border security and immigration policy; tax issues; growth of government and for "big-spending pork-barrel projects" recklessly pushed through Congress. "You no longer stand for the principles you ran on, and it will ultimately be your downfall," he warned.
_____________________
The interview with Specter during the primary with Toomey is another good example of what you speak...oh, wait, proves you wrong. Sorry for inconveniencing you with the facts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.