Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
if your boss offered to let you stay at a 30% pay cut assuming the company wasn’t in dire financial straits you’d probably be a little miffed.

Depends. If I was the highest paid in my profession and was making 200% more the others in my field were making, a 30% 'cut' might still be higher then I could get elsewhere.

24 posted on 10/19/2007 3:01:25 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.

Depends on if they wanted to cut my pay from 8 million to 5 million or I could go and get a real job say at $50,000 a year with the rest of us.

I have zero sympathy in cases of multi-millionaire entertainers getting a cut.


27 posted on 10/19/2007 3:05:46 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I’m calling BS on that. It wouldn’t depend on anything. If your boss walked up to you right now and asked you to take a 30% pay cut that’s him say you’re over paid, and if you say yes that’s you admitting he’s right. All that crap about how much he’s making compared to others is just more class envy BS. They asked him to take a 30% pay cut and they didn’t even offer to negotiate, it was a take the cut or go away, and that IS an insult and the fact that Torre is smart enough to know it shows he’s smarter than them.


30 posted on 10/19/2007 3:07:57 PM PDT by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

>> Depends. If I was the highest paid in my profession and was making 200% more the others in my field were making, a 30% ‘cut’ might still be higher then I could get elsewhere.

True ... but if you’re an established multi-millionaire, you wouldn’t need to deal with the insult of a reduced contract offer.

In this respect, he’s a little like Roger Clemens. He’s rich enough that the money itself isn’t as important as what it represents. I’m convinced that Clemens took the money from the Yankees, not for the money itself ... but for the fact that the astronomical offer is an acknowledgement of his greatness as a pitcher, and a means of comparing favorably himself to pitching talent throughout the league. He’s the highest paid pitcher in the history of baseball ... that means something.

Likewise for Torre. He doesn’t need the $5M, and he’d rather not accept a pay-cut (and the insult that a paycut represents), for money he doesn’t need.

If you were worth millions, and really didn’t need to work another day in your life ... would you accept an insulting pay cut? He doesn’t need the Yankees, or their money ... so why deal with the insulting contract offer?

H


33 posted on 10/19/2007 3:11:31 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor (How 'Bout Them Cowboys!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson