Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Temporarily (as we know most people in the states are conservative minded); that will be remedies in the normal if it happens, electoral process).. It will have the long term-effect of having much more conservative senators!


11 posted on 10/20/2007 4:19:00 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1
Temporarily (as we know most people in the states are conservative minded); that will be remedies in the normal if it happens, electoral process).. It will have the long term-effect of having much more conservative senators!

Let's look at the Senators who would not be in office if the 17th was repealed. Neither of the Senators from Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, Maine, one of the two from Tennessee, one of the two from Kentucky, David Vitter from Louisiana, either Coburn or Inhofe from Oklahoma. It's not just headcount. Losing senators from the South and Oklahoma would also tend to remove the more conservative ones.

I will also point out that the Democrats picked up several state legislatures in 2006. That doesn't bode well for your belief that the Democrat control would be temporary.

32 posted on 10/21/2007 6:25:36 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson