Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World's biggest pre-release pirate music site netted
BREITBART.com ^ | Oct 23, 2007 | AFP

Posted on 10/23/2007 6:19:57 AM PDT by Lusis

British and Dutch police said they shut down Tuesday the website OiNK, the world's biggest source of pirated pre-release chart albums. OiNK distributed albums often weeks ahead of their official release date. More than 60 major album releases had been leaked onto the Internet so far this year.

The site had an estimated membership of 180,000. People were only invited to become members if they could prove they had music to offer and had to keep posting tracks to maintain their membership.

It is alleged the site was operated by a 24-year-old man who lived near Middlesbrough in north-east England. He was arrested Tuesday. The site's servers, based in Amsterdam, were seized in raids last week.

The Interpol-coordinated raids followed a two-year investigation by the British Phonographic Industry and the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry bodies.

"OiNK was central to the illegal distribution of pre-release music online," said Jeremy Banks, head of the IFPI's Internet anti-piracy unit.

"This was not a case of friends sharing music for pleasure. This was a worldwide network that got hold of music they did not own the rights to and posted it online."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: filesharing; mpaa; music; oink; riaa

1 posted on 10/23/2007 6:20:00 AM PDT by Lusis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lusis

Bummer.


2 posted on 10/23/2007 6:21:34 AM PDT by dbehsman (Life member NRA and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lusis

This is good news. Now start fining a few of the 180,000.


3 posted on 10/23/2007 6:25:07 AM PDT by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson
I wonder why they don’t go after the Chinese for their piracy. Is it cowardice or stupidity on the part of the British government?

I think it sucks that OiNK is down, but I’m sure that five more new torrent sites will crop up to take it’s place.

4 posted on 10/23/2007 6:47:50 AM PDT by dbehsman (Life member NRA and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lusis
15 men on a dead man's chest.

Arrrr. That be pirate music matey.

5 posted on 10/23/2007 6:49:26 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

Instead of worrying about the 180,000 people sharing music I would find out who leaks the albums in the first place. Out of that number probably 179,900+ have no way to access the albums they only share them once they are leaked. The leakers have to be intimately involved in production, distribution or the media who have access to advance copies. I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if some of the artists themselves had a hand in it to generate some buzz.

While I admit that piracy does do damage to the industry I take their loss figures with a huge container of salt. When they say that they lose 30 gazillion dollars a year to piracy they assume that the people downloading the music/movies/software/whatever would have actually bought the stuff had they not downloaded it for free. I say no way, 99.9% of the people would have just skipped it. If you could wave a magic wand and make all the sites disappear tomorrow I highly doubt you would see a sudden jump in sales to compensate for the loss of downloading sites. Just my opinion, take it for what it’s worth.


6 posted on 10/23/2007 7:54:49 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
When they say that they lose 30 gazillion dollars a year to piracy they assume that the people downloading the music/movies/software/whatever would have actually bought the stuff had they not downloaded it for free

No argument there. My problem is with the idea that just because something is digital, it's free.

7 posted on 10/23/2007 8:19:08 AM PDT by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Yeah, really? WTF do people want to “fine” everyone? Geez.

Find the damned leakers. When someone leaks classified, go after them. When the newspapers print it, go after them too. Don’t go after the people that buy the papers. Geez


8 posted on 10/23/2007 10:51:21 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://realitycheck.blogsome.com - and yes, yes, I'm a "FredHead". Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

The ‘leakers’ are the main issue. Need to find them. I’ll bet they are the ones attacking P2P also. Check out this article - proves it’s not just all ‘little people’ out there trying to save a buck - it’s the labels and the government!: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070916-leaked-media-defender-e-mails-reveal-secret-government-project.html
Leaked Media Defender e-mails reveal secret government project


9 posted on 10/23/2007 11:08:16 AM PDT by Chili Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson