Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul is not interested in third party run
BOSTON GLOBE ^ | 10 NOVEMBER 2007 | BOSTON GLOBE

Posted on 11/10/2007 9:55:15 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

DURHAM, N.H. -- Texas Congressman Ron Paul said he is "not interested" in a third party run for president if he is unable to win the Republican presidential nomination next year. "I have no intention of doing that," Paul told local reporters. "This country is not very democratic and only allows for two parties." In 1988, Paul ran for president as the nominee for the Libertarian Party. He said that experience showed him a third party run would be futile.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: looser; ronpaul; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

READ IT AND WEEP PAUL BASHERS - HE'S NOT GOING TO "HELP" THE DEMOCRATS OR GIVE THE RACE TO HILLARY

1 posted on 11/10/2007 9:55:16 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Let’s hope.


2 posted on 11/10/2007 9:56:32 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

A third party this late in the game would be useless anyway. If people wanted another party, the time to start it would be right after the election. Start a completely party, not libertarian or green party. Give it a new name, establish it as a truly conservative party and destroy the Democratic party. Then it would go back to a two party system.


3 posted on 11/10/2007 9:58:30 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
“This country is not very democratic and only allows for two parties.”

Ron, our founders had good reasons for not setting up a parliamentary form of government.

4 posted on 11/10/2007 10:00:35 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Well, I’m probably wrong, but I was hoping that Paul would run as a third party candidate. And his anti-war stance would cause enough of hillary’s kook supporters to jump ship to make it a massacre. The good news is, hillary’s imploding on her own and is setting herself up to be the next McGovern.
5 posted on 11/10/2007 10:00:38 AM PST by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Does this mean his money will suddenly dry up? ;-)


6 posted on 11/10/2007 10:01:12 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

At the time of the founding, there were at least four active parties. It has nothing to do with a parliamentary government.


7 posted on 11/10/2007 10:03:36 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Ya, and he is not going to support the republican nominee either.


8 posted on 11/10/2007 10:04:54 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Yea it does. The electoral college led directly to the two-party system.


9 posted on 11/10/2007 10:05:36 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mainerforglobalwarming
"...And his anti-war stance would cause enough of hillary’s kook supporters to jump ship to make it a massacre"

I live in a fairly liberal neighborhood, and judging by the yard signs, and bumper stickers, RP's support crosses party lines and is clearly growing faster now than it was two months ago.

10 posted on 11/10/2007 10:07:23 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

The electoral college was created specifically to deal with 3 or more candidates.


11 posted on 11/10/2007 10:09:18 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Well if he doesn’t run, and Hillary hangs on and wins the nomination, perhaps Nadar as the green party candidate gets far more support than in previous years.


12 posted on 11/10/2007 10:09:33 AM PST by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Give it a new name, establish it as a truly conservative party and destroy the Democratic party. Then it would go back to a two party system.

1) How would establishing a third party even more conservative than the GOP destroy the Democratic party? Liberals and libertarians won't just magically vanish.

2) You're implying a) that a two-party system is a good thing and b) that we actually have a two-party system now. All I see is government party A and government party B. Their fundamental similarities far outweigh any trivial policy differences.

13 posted on 11/10/2007 10:09:52 AM PST by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw

he’s no Republican, and I can’t believe he fooled Texas of all places into thinking he was


14 posted on 11/10/2007 10:25:08 AM PST by RDTF ("Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear". Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

You are so correct.
It has always appeared to me that people repeat what they think he has said or what others think he has said but if they were to read what he has written and actually said, honestly how could they support him


15 posted on 11/10/2007 10:32:15 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: svcw
It has always appeared to me that people repeat what they think he has said or what others think he has said but if they were to read what he has written and actually said, honestly how could they support him

I am facinated by the Paulhead's dedication to thier great leader...It's damn near a cult like the global warming crowd.


16 posted on 11/10/2007 10:38:08 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Glad to hear it. Ron Paul is doing something America needs right now. Get back to basics on why our country was founded.


17 posted on 11/10/2007 10:42:12 AM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
I fascinated by the Bush dedication to their great leader. If Bush was running today he would not get elected since so many conservatives are disappointed.
18 posted on 11/10/2007 10:45:34 AM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
I rest my case...


19 posted on 11/10/2007 10:47:15 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Let’s hope.

****************

I'll believe it when I see it.

20 posted on 11/10/2007 10:49:11 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson