Skip to comments.
Clinton Campaign Acused for the Second Time of Planting a Question at a Public Appearance
Fox News ^
Posted on 11/10/2007 1:36:51 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
To: Sub-Driver
"Wait I can answer that question"
To: Sub-Driver
62
posted on
11/10/2007 2:55:00 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: IM2MAD
But this was at an April event.The point is that the campaign tried to spin the recent plant as an aberration--certainly not their practice. In so doing, and by saying, "Won't happen again," they acknowledged it was not kosher, and contrary to the spirit of these town hall meetings. This belated revelation reveals that planting questions was SOP, not an aberration at all, and the only reason they won't be doing it again--if they can be believed--is because they were caught.
63
posted on
11/10/2007 2:56:20 PM PST
by
Eroteme
To: Sub-Driver
Piffle, this happened in April. The witch gets a pass from the lame-stream media, even though it shows a pattern of deception just like everything else she does.
64
posted on
11/10/2007 2:57:11 PM PST
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: Sub-Driver
Mo Elliethee, spokesman for Clinton's campaign in Iowa, told Fox that Hayler and Mitchell "had a previous relationship" and that a discussion about Clinton arose out of a normal conversation between two people who knew each other well. "They had a previous relationship and were talking before the event and the topic of the senator's position on Iraq came up and Geoffrey said he had some questions," Elliethee said. "Chris suggested Geoffrey ask a question."
Mitchell, however, said that he and Hayler did not know each other personally before the event.
"I had no previous relationship with him," said Mitchell. "I knew his name and by name only as some who worked for Sen. Evan Bayh. But we didn't know each other and I had never met him before this event."
Interesting!
65
posted on
11/10/2007 2:58:26 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: MurryMom
...denied attempting to plant a pro-Clinton question.If they did, which I fully suspect they did, would they admit it?
This country can't survive four years of the Beast in charge...
66
posted on
11/10/2007 3:03:03 PM PST
by
Libloather
(Hillary donors find their way to the cover of Time. And the very next day they're doing it...)
To: doug from upland
Her brothers name wasn't Elian by any chance?
To: Sub-Driver
MSM criticizing Clinton for this? Why is it not ok to plant questions in the audience, but it's ok to plant, water and harvest bundled contributions to skirt the finance laws?
Looks like the media just want to show how they're not favoring the witch.
To: Sub-Driver
Why does Hillary have to plant questions in the crowd or carry a scripted binder with her, didn’t Dan Rather say she was the smartest woman in the world?
69
posted on
11/10/2007 3:09:56 PM PST
by
Plains Drifter
(If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
To: Shady
70
posted on
11/10/2007 3:23:05 PM PST
by
Dante3
To: Sub-Driver
71
posted on
11/10/2007 3:28:17 PM PST
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Dante3
Hillary apparently is too stupid and/or too devious to answer surprise questions. As her husband was, she is focused on getting elected and not focused on running running the country for the people.
It's an agenda thing.
72
posted on
11/10/2007 3:28:56 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Sub-Driver
Blood in the water. Every candidate in the Dem party is going to try to catch her cheating again.
73
posted on
11/10/2007 3:32:28 PM PST
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs....doing the job of the media.)
To: Sub-Driver
I told Chris I had other issues I wanted to raise with Sen. Clinton," Mitchell said. There's your mistake, buddy. You should have kept quiet about that until she gave you the nod, then you could have asked any question you wanted.
Of course, being a minister, perhaps you think that might not have been totally honest......
Um.........
Did her campaign just call a minister a LIAR?
74
posted on
11/10/2007 3:33:40 PM PST
by
Mygirlsmom
(Bill and Hill are perfectly clear on the meaning of "is" as long as it's used in the word SOCIALIST)
To: Dante3
Her problem is that see needs to have planted questions because she tells so many lies she is unable to answer direct questions without knowing what her last lie was.
75
posted on
11/10/2007 3:42:31 PM PST
by
chiefqc
To: Dante3
TOO STUPID and TOO Devious and TOO Unable!!
To: Sub-Driver
I wish one of these people, given the opportunity to ask her a question, would forget the 'fed' one and ask something totally unexpected - she would come unglued - and someone's head would roll =
Were I the treasonous questioner, I'd be gone lickity split, and never, bur never go near a public park...
77
posted on
11/10/2007 4:08:50 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: Sub-Driver
We won’t do it again, and this time we REALLY mean it.
To: Enchante
Very good. Two more unasked questions. If she were a Republican, WWRD (what would russert do)?
To: Sub-Driver
The “World’s Smartest Women’ is dumber than a box a retarded rocks and can’t survive thinking on her feet in a real debate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
