Posted on 11/12/2007 4:15:42 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
What did Hillary know about the planted question in Iowa and when did she know it?
The Clinton campaign, and apparently Hillary herself, is denying that she had any idea whom she was calling on. But according to information in the New York Times, Clinton campaign aides had in fact prompted her to call on the plant.
At 10:51 AM ET this morning, MSNBC anchor Tamron Hall interviewed Hillary campaign co-chair Tom Vilsack, the former Dem governor of Iowa.
TAMRON HALL: Senator Clinton herself said she knew nothing about this and promised it would not happen again . . .
TOM VILSACK: Obviously Hillary Clinton does not condone the planting of questions; she did not know that this young person had been given that question.
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
It’s always the cover-up that gets you. Ping to Today show list.
They played this little cutie’s question on NBC Nightly and even caught the wink at the end. Nice.
"No.."
She had to know everything since she had to know who to call on and how to frame her answer. Believe otherwise and I've got a nice bridge to sell you over the East River.
The question someone needs to ask Ms. Rodham is if she didn’t know about this; How did she know to call on this particular person?
Now luck of the draw can explain it happening once, but twice?
Hillary, you’ve got some ‘splainin’ to do!
The complete truth is that it’s taken for granted that the questions will be on a limited number of topics. Any deviation and somebody loses their job.
Brit’s Panel says that this, with her other recent stumbles, might hurt her in Iowa.
“Clinton”
“Honesty”
Both have seven letters.
Both have an O in them and an N and a T.
I can’t think of any other connections between the two words.
As he says, why would they bother planting questions if Hilly did not know who to call on? How stupid do they think we are? Very.
We all know the answer to this. Hillary controls everything that goes on in her campaign. This is not a subject that is in doubt.
What is actually beginning to interest me, and I don’t much care for salacious gossip, is the constant presence of Huma in all of these videos. She is never not there, and unlike many factotums, is very visible, very obvious.
How much? See, right now I’m working out a deal for some swamp land in Florida. I figure I just might have enough left over for your bridge. That way I will own property in two places and I can vote for her twice. At least that’s what that friendly ACORN worker told me.
Being able to control some of the questions being asked of the candidate is smart campaigning. Getting caught doing it, twice, is something else.
“As he says, why would they bother planting questions if Hilly did not know who to call on?”
That guy is brilliant, I tell ya! Did I mention that Finkelstein = me, governs?
.."kinda hard to attack a young college student with nerve, eh hildabeast, it wouldn't look good to call her a liar, a Republican plant, or anything else now would it, not part of a vast right wing conspiracy eh?...even the lib who asked you about your vote on the war rattled your nerve when he wasn't scripted....and now with the MSM asking questions your finding your bag of lies ain't working
That would have to assume that Democrats are smart enough to know when they are being lied to. They aren’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
