Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
>>>>>"We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child." Thats why we need a HLA.

You'll end up killing more unborn by demanding a human life amendment before you have the required support. It will only delay the overturning of Roe by solidifying pro-choice opposition. But regardless of the consequences, at least you and Dobson and the rest can feel good about yourself right?

122 posted on 11/16/2007 6:50:47 PM PST by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Federalist
But regardless of the consequences, at least you and Dobson and the rest can feel good about yourself right?

You nailed it.

123 posted on 11/16/2007 7:03:58 PM PST by Finny (There are many enemies in our work. One of them is envy. -- A British naval officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Federalist

Well said.


124 posted on 11/16/2007 7:05:31 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Federalist

WTF are you talking about?

While I favor a HLA, my first goal is to overturn Roe v Wade and end abortion on demand. Why? Because there isn’t enough support for passing a HLA and hasn’t been for the last 35 years!

Before you run off at the mouth, you should get your facts straight. Dobson opposes Fred. I support Fred.


126 posted on 11/16/2007 7:40:42 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson