[Our man in washington]

I’ve got an issue to beat Hillary Clinton with.

Hillary Clinton is strongly concerned about global warming but opposes putting nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Therefore, one of the following must be true:

1. She doesn’t really believe global warming is a threat and she’s just using it for a campaign issue.

2. She does think global warming is a threat, but thinks Nevada’s three electoral votes are more important that this serious threat to the planet.

3. She thinks we can somehow cut down on CO2 emissions by a significant amount without using nuclear power. That proposition is absurd.

4. She thinks the nuclear waste should go someplace else, even though Yucca Mountain was chosen after a multiyear study and it would probably take decades to find another place.

I wish Hillary would explain which of these four is correct. My guess is option #2. Not one of these four options would reflect well on her. I wish the Republicans would press the point.

[padre35]

Actually, Hillary can be beaten by speaking Female as it were.

Rove was genius at taking an opponent’s strength and making it a weakness, to beat Hillary, pound her on things like lack of action on “Equal Pay” that she never moved for in the Senate, stuff like that.

The Dhimmis are planning on the male vote being split on Iraq, and the Female vote going to Hillary along with new single female voters registering and Voting Hilde, why not give them reasons not to vote for Hillary?

[supercat]

1. She doesn’t really believe global warming is a threat and she’s just using it for a campaign issue.
2. She does think global warming is a threat, but thinks Nevada’s three electoral votes are more important that this serious threat to the planet.

5. She wants to keep the 'little people' in check by forbidding the use of any and all energy sources, except by the elite.