Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn
But could some lawyer out there please explain: Assuming they didn't use the federal postal system, why is it a federal crime if Scruggs et al. tried to bribe a state judge?

The feds always base their jurisdiction in these cases on mail fraud (something in the case was mailed) or on wire fraud (use of interstate phone calls, faxes, emails or bank wire transfers).

It's virtually impossible to do any business transaction-- legitimate or otherwise-- without using the mails or "interstate wires."

30 posted on 11/28/2007 4:09:37 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
> It's virtually impossible to do any business transaction-- legitimate or otherwise-- without using the mails or "interstate wires." <

I understand. But Scruggs and the Judge are in the same town, Oxford. And it seems to me that Scruggs et al. surely would have been smart enough to know that they should approach the Judge only in person -- never over the phone or via post.

32 posted on 11/28/2007 4:15:22 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson