Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Says US Agrees: Forget Navy Spat
AP ^ | 12/4/07 | FOSTER KLUG

Posted on 12/04/2007 12:17:07 PM PST by charles m

WASHINGTON (AP) — Chinese and American military officials have agreed to put behind them a dispute over China's refusal to allow port calls to Hong Kong by U.S. Navy warships, a Chinese official said Tuesday.

China has hinted that its denials of port calls for the USS Kitty Hawk and eight other ships were triggered by Congress' honoring of the Dalai Lama and U.S. arms sales to Chinese rival Taiwan. The rejection of the ships drew protests from the United States and led the Bush administration to call China's Washington defense attache to the Pentagon to hear complaints about the matter.

In a meeting Monday between Eric Edelman, U.S. undersecretary of defense for policy, and Lt. Gen. Ma Xiaotian, deputy chief of the general staff for foreign affairs, the Kitty Hawk issue came up but "was not one of the major points that was discussed," said Wang Baodong, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy.

"The two sides agreed to put the issue behind them," Wang said. He described the overall mood of the regularly scheduled annual defense talks as candid and friendly.

The White House has said Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi called the ship rejection a "misunderstanding" during talks with President Bush but offered no apology. The Chinese Foreign Ministry later backed away from that characterization, saying that ties had been "disturbed and harmed" by "erroneous" U.S. actions.

During Monday's meeting, Wang said the Chinese side raised its concerns about U.S. ties with Taiwan, "which is regarded as one of the major obstacles affecting mutual trust and communication between the two armies."

Taiwan is a close U.S. ally, despite a lack of official ties, and the United States, committed by law to defend Taiwan, has hinted it would go to war to protect the self-governing island if nuclear-armed China were to attack.

China claims Taiwan as its own, and officials in Beijing vow to attack at any declaration of Taiwanese independence. China has stationed hundreds of missiles across the Taiwan Strait from the island.

Ma, in his talks with Edelman, urged the United States to stop official communications with Taiwan and to halt the sale of advanced weapons "so as not to send the wrong signals to the island," Wang said.

Ma also said that "sound opportunities exist for the improvement and development" of military relations between China and the United States, Wang said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; hongkong; kittyhawk; navy; portcall; thanksgiving; usn; usskittyhawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
"eight other ships"? That's news to me. Seems almost like the US navy is covering up for the Chinese.
1 posted on 12/04/2007 12:17:08 PM PST by charles m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: charles m

Next time a Chinese naval vessel docks in a U.S. port the crew should be abducted and forced to either work in a laundry or to build a railroad.


2 posted on 12/04/2007 12:21:06 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

I know that there were 2 minesweepers denied entry during an earlier incident, and 1 frigate about a week after the Kitty was denied. I’m guessing the other 4 vessels were part of the Kitty’s battlegroup. Sounds like a reasonable number.


3 posted on 12/04/2007 12:22:11 PM PST by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

We should homeport a carrier group in Keelung.


4 posted on 12/04/2007 12:22:21 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

Put it behind us my @$$. Those are my brothers out there and this insult had the potential to cost lives . This is too much like the events leading up to and after the attack on the U.S.S. COLE .


5 posted on 12/04/2007 12:23:36 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

Forgive? Perhaps. Forget? Never.


6 posted on 12/04/2007 12:30:09 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

How about a 20% tarrif on all crap coming from that armpit of a nation?

Don’t we have any dignity as a nation?


7 posted on 12/04/2007 12:30:48 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
I do... I do not buy chicom... some components built within some things are impossible to filter through... but we can choose to not do business with our enemy. Those people saying it cannot be done are too lazy to actually see that it is possible to reduce consumption from that sh!thole to minimal levels.

LLS

8 posted on 12/04/2007 12:35:00 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: charles m; ponder life

Appeasement. On steroids.


9 posted on 12/04/2007 1:14:50 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m
I can no longer stomach this Administration's quisling behavior with the Chicoms.

Where is the strength of character of someone to stand up in Congress and begin quoting the historic words of Oliver Cromwell spoken to the Long Parliament in 1653:

'You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go'.

10 posted on 12/04/2007 1:32:09 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Appeasement. On steroids.

In a sense that the US currently has the upper hand disagreements and isn't using it to the fullest. But wouldn't that be true of most countries the US encounters on less than cordial terms?

And I honestly believe, as China strengthens her hands, won't use them to the fullest in not so friendly encounters.

11 posted on 12/04/2007 3:44:55 PM PST by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: charles m
Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi called the ship rejection a "misunderstanding" during talks with President Bush but offered no apology.

No apology basically means "screw you"

12 posted on 12/04/2007 3:48:43 PM PST by Popman (My doohickey is discombobulated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


13 posted on 12/04/2007 5:00:32 PM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m
Fine. Forget about it.

Just no more port calls in China.

14 posted on 12/04/2007 5:14:19 PM PST by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

Should I surmise from your response that you believe aircraft carriers sail the world without any escorts?


15 posted on 12/04/2007 5:21:51 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47; jahp; LilAngel; metmom; EggsAckley; Battle Axe; SweetCaroline; Grizzled Bear; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
”MADE IN CHINA” Ping.

(Please FReepmail me if you would like to be on or off of the list.)
16 posted on 12/05/2007 2:19:19 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charles m

Yep, when in doubt, our government does the usual: roll over and show our belly.


17 posted on 12/05/2007 4:13:03 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
>I can no longer stomach this Administration's quisling behavior with the Chicoms.<

U.S. carrier help? (Admiral offers help to China)

Adm. Tim Keating, the U.S. Pacific Command leader, told reporters during his visit to China last month that while building and operating a carrier battle group is complex, the United States is willing to help.

"We would, if they choose to develop [an aircraft-carrier program], help them to the degree that they seek and the degree that we're capable, in developing their programs," Adm. Keating said.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1845931/posts

U.S. may share missile info with China
WASHINGTON, June 4 (UPI) -- The United States would "seriously" consider sharing technology and missile warning intelligence with China, (Secretary of Defense Gates) the U.S. defense chief said Sunday.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1846099/posts

18 posted on 12/05/2007 7:49:40 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

Not 8 of them.


19 posted on 12/05/2007 8:25:01 AM PST by charles m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
Don’t we have any dignity as a nation?

The majority of the populace does however our leaders and ceo's don't.

20 posted on 12/05/2007 9:32:57 AM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson