I couldn't agree more. Let's see what James Madison had to say about the First Amendment:
So insatiable is a love of power that it has resorted to a distinction between the freedom and licentiousness of the press for the purpose of converting the third amendment of the Constitution, which was dictated by the most lively anxiety to preserve that freedom, into an instrument for abridging it.
--James Madison, Address of the General Assembly to the People of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 23 Jan. 1799 Writings 6:333--36
______________________________________
Is, then, the Federal Government, it will be asked, destitute of every authority for restraining the licentiousness of the press, and for shielding itself against the libellous attacks which may be made on those who administer it?
The Constitution alone can answer this question. If no such power be expressly delegated, and if it be not both necessary and proper to carry into execution an express power--above all, if it be expressly forbidden, by a declaratory amendment to the Constitution--the answer must be, that the Federal Government is destitute of all such authority.
James Madison, Report on the Virginia Resolutions, Jan. 1800 Writings 6:385--401
______________________________________
It appears that Madison believed the First Amendment protected licentiousness when it came to freedom the press.
In light of Madison's writings, what evidence do you have that the original intent/meaning of the First Amendment was only meant to protect political and religious speech?
Was porn still illegal in the colonies?
Note that Madison understood full well that the First Amendment depended on the existence of the Third Amendment. From time to time I post the whole argument that links the First, Second and Third together as a rational basis for LIBERTY.