[muawiyah]

Why, because I doubt she actually screamed anything at the top of her voice.

What we have here is a neighbor who is a cop filing a criminal nuisance complaint against her.

A neighbor of mine once called the Board of Health out to look at my garden. They reported back that it looked like a garden, even had large squash in it.

I laid to on that bytch with a zoning complaint that cost her several thousand bucks to get out of, and she almost had to remove half her roof!

She struck first, but my response was in kind. Here the cop went over the top straight to the courts immediately ~ his response was not in kind.

In fact, as a trained LEO he should have asked if she'd had an accident of some kind and needed help. Instead he told her to shut up.

I strongly suspect earlier bad blood.

[Mr. Silverback]

I think you may be right, but let's stay focused here: The court didn't say "We overturn this because we doubt the cop told the truth," they overturned it because even if she did what she's accused of in the exact way she's accused of doing it, it somehow falls under protected speech.

In other words, if we take the facts as the court took them, playing old 2 Live Crew CDs on your stereo at full volume with an open window is probably protected speech.