Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Vulgarity and obscenity don't fall within the First Amendment.

With a few exceptions (so-called "fighting words") vulgarity IS protected speech. What this woman said falls under the First Amendment.

From http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=18508:

Almost 30 years later in 1971, the high court limited Chaplinsky in Cohen v. California by holding that an individual could not be held criminally liable for wearing a jacket into a courthouse that said "F*** the Draft". [my note - the jacket had the real F-word ] The Supreme Court distinguished the two by explaining that Cohen's action was a "simple public display" as opposed to a direct insult or intent to incite harm, as was the case in Chaplinsky.

97 posted on 12/14/2007 6:39:56 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
With a few exceptions (so-called "fighting words") vulgarity IS protected speech.

Just because a black-robed potentate says it is doesn't mean that has anything to do with original intent. I don't know about you, but I think it's long past time we stopped acting like it does.

101 posted on 12/14/2007 7:01:25 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson