Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Next time, evacuees subject to criminal checks[TX] [Hurricane or State emergency]
Houston Chronicle ^ | 15 Dec 2007 | Terri Langford

Posted on 12/16/2007 4:06:00 PM PST by BGHater

State's plan calls for putting some offenders on separate bus

Texans seeking to escape the next hurricane or state emergency by evacuation bus will first be submitted to criminal background checks, the state's emergency management director says.

The idea, according to Jack Colley, is to keep sex offenders and others who may be wanted by police off the same buses used by the most vulnerable during an evacuation: the elderly, disabled residents and children.

"This will allow us to help them evacuate," Colley said of sex offenders and others wanted for crimes. "We're not going to leave anyone."

Though the intent is to make sure vulnerable evacuees aren't victimized, Colley acknowledged that culling sex offenders and other criminals from a herd of evacuees during a potentially chaotic evacuation comes with plenty of challenges.

"We'll be able to do it," he said of the task, declining to be more specific about the process because of safety concerns.

He said the agency's first concern is to move people out of harm's way.

But Colley insists a better filter on who gets on an evacuation bus with special needs residents will eliminate potential problems.

"We're here to save lives," Colley said.

Earlier this month, it was announced AT&T Inc. has contracted with the Texas Governor's Division of Emergency Management to provide electronic wristbands for those residents wanting them, before they board an evacuation bus.

The wristbands would be scanned by emergency management officials and the person's name would be added to a bus boarding log. That person's name and their bus information would be sent wirelessly to the University of Texas Center for Space Research data center.

When the evacuee arrives at a designated shelter, the wristband would be scanned again to help state employees respond to inquiries from the public about the safety and location of evacuated family members.

The decision to wear a wristband is purely voluntary. But anyone who boards an evacuation bus will have to provide a name. There will be no requirement to show an identification card, such as a driver's license, but officials may ask those boarding for an ID.

Colley confirmed that all of those names will be checked against existing sex offender registries and other criminal background databases. Colley said officials are not interested in evacuees' past criminal convictions, only if they have outstanding warrants, are sex offenders or parolees.

After Hurricane Katrina, nearly 1,700 parolees failed to check in with authorities in Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana.

"We're all entitled to privacy, but we're not entitled to anonymity," Colley said.

Colley would not discuss how thorough the background checks will be. He said the state's focus was keeping sex offenders and those with current warrants segregated from vulnerable residents.

"We'll have procedures and we're not going to advertise what they are," he said.

Colley stressed no one will be left behind during an evacuation because they have a criminal history. But those with warrants or with a sex offense conviction will be evacuated separately.

Lessons from Katrina, Rita Initially, Houston became the destination for at least 273,000 people fleeing hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. Among those evacuees were parolees and others with criminal histories. During those hurricanes, there was no way to segregate sex offenders and others from vulnerable populations during an emergency.

Colley says the state's intention is to keep evacuees safe.

"We took that very seriously after Rita and Katrina and there was no system," he said.

What the state is doing, is perfectly legal, according to at least one expert.

"Since it's a government record they're checking you against, there is not the same invasion of privacy concerns that may come up in other contexts," said professor Charles Rhodes, who teaches constitutional law at South Texas College of Law. "I think the need for it would outweigh any privacy concerns. This is a public safety issue"

Rhodes' only reservation would be the system itself, whether it's set up to handle, perhaps, a false match indicating someone had a criminal record when they did not. He also wants to know how smoothly such checks could be processed.

"It's going to be interesting to see how this is implemented in the time of an emergency," Rhodes said.

terri.langford@chron.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: emergency; evacuees; hurricane; texas

1 posted on 12/16/2007 4:06:03 PM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

because “evacuations” are not time sensitive ?


2 posted on 12/16/2007 4:11:24 PM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Would it be more prudent to evacuate before they herd you into a bus?

If you have to be evacuated by bus, they should also tattoo a giant “L” on your forehead.


3 posted on 12/16/2007 4:11:35 PM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Hmmm, how about stop spending my tax dollars to give someone a free ride and let them drive themselves outta town????!!

Exceptions for elderly and disabled of course but if you can carry a case of beer you can take care of yourself.


4 posted on 12/16/2007 4:11:41 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stompk

“because “evacuations” are not time sensitive ?”

Wll it takes 5 days to ship in water but the 10 day waiting period for the background check is not expected to be a major issue.


5 posted on 12/16/2007 4:13:15 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

How long before someone claims this is “racist”?


6 posted on 12/16/2007 4:15:35 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Believe it or not, some people are in such economic circumstances that they cannot afford a car and all taxes assessed upon the purchase or rental thereof and the fuel necessary to drive it, including taxes. Others cannot drive because they lack a license from the state to do so for various reasons, including vision problems, epilepsy, demonstrated inability to handle a motor vehicle, and simply because they never learned how to drive or don’t find driving necessary or helpful under ordinary circumstances.


7 posted on 12/16/2007 4:18:21 PM PST by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

“Believe it or not, some people are in such economic circumstances that they cannot afford a car and all taxes assessed upon the purchase or rental thereof and the fuel necessary to drive it, including taxes.”

Here in Florida we had 4 hurricanes in about 4 months. Amazingly the folks that needed to be evacuated were without undue problems.

Some people need assistance but it is not the govt’s job to ensure the transportation of every citizen. Most especially in places that have wasted billions of taxes dollars through corruption.


8 posted on 12/16/2007 4:38:41 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
So next time, Texas will not allow all of New Orleans to be sent their way in school busses?


9 posted on 12/16/2007 4:39:13 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I like it. Let's burden an emergency situation with more bureaucratic red tape that endangers everybody.

But hey, we can put the undesirables on dysfunctional buses so they can die when the disaster strikes. And make the survivors and their ACLU lawyers rich afterwards.

All to make some politicians look good to an uncomprehending public.

America: The experiment was a really good try, once upon a time...

10 posted on 12/16/2007 6:18:58 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stompk

I know, let’s evacuated the pervs NOW to some island far, far away. Or maybe we could distinguish them from others by minor surgery of a specific nature. It would serve two purposes — remove them as a threat from society, immediately; make them easily recognizable in a hurricane.


11 posted on 12/16/2007 7:22:52 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Be far more useful to apply this sort of screening to refugees from elswhere ARRIVING in Texas.

From Louisiana, say...


12 posted on 12/16/2007 8:35:30 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson