Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Blood Feud
National Review ^ | December 31, 2007 | David Freddoso

Posted on 01/01/2008 9:01:14 AM PST by RKB-AFG

Republican Blood Feud

The worst-case primary scenario.

By David Freddoso

Less than a week remains before Republicans begin the long and arduous road to choosing a nominee. It begins in Iowa on Jan. 3, and continues at least through Feb. 5, the day that more than 20 states will select delegates to the convention in Minnesota’s Twin Cities next fall.

The possibility for idle speculation is endless. But there are a number of things we know for sure. First, the rise of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee is more than a passing phenomenon. Polls show that his religious conservative voters are highly dedicated and motivated — 65 percent of his backers will “definitely” vote for him in Iowa, better than any other candidate. They could even prove to be better organized than his shoestring campaign would suggest, thanks to churches and pastors in that state and several others.

Second, although former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is struggling and slipping badly in national and key state polls, he is almost certain to win hundreds of delegates by the time Super Tuesday is over, no matter how poorly he does before that date. New York alone guarantees him 101 delegates (about 1,190 are required to win). Throw in Connecticut, New Jersey, and Delaware (all of which have adopted winner-take-all), and he cannot do worse than 201 delegates — not even if he fails to take Florida’s 57.

These two certainties point to one possible outcome that should alarm Republicans of all ideological stripes — the religious and the irreligious, the right-to-lifers, the gun-rights advocates, the supply-siders, and the neoconservatives alike. A two-way knock-down-drag-out fight between Huckabee and Giuliani could completely destroy the coalition that Ronald Reagan built by combining social and economic conservatives with anti-Communists.

In one corner stands Mike Huckabee, whose campaign speaks freely of destroying the conservative movement. “It’s gone,” said Ed Rollins, his national campaign chairman. “The breakup of what was the Reagan coalition — social conservatives, defense conservatives, antitax conservatives — it doesn’t mean a whole lot to people anymore.” Naturally, Rollins points to Huckabee as the figure to form the new coalition.

Huckabee, a Baptist minister, has an appeal that doubles as his most unattractive quality. Far from merely appealing to Christians or engaging in normal expressions of faith, he is consciously making himself the “Jesus candidate” in order to win the Republican nomination. It is a strategy exploitative of faith, yet it has worked so far because so many Republicans are Christians and so many are also unhappy with the rest of the Republican field.

Lost in the so-called “floating cross” controversy over Huckabee’s Christmas ad was the ad’s overt use of Christianity to win an election. When Huckabee reminded Iowans in the ad that “what really matters is the celebration of the birth of Christ,” it obviously had a lot less to do with glorifying the Lord on Dec. 25 than it did with convincing a certain kind of Iowan to caucus for Huckabee on Jan. 3. Huckabee’s campaign has been replete with such uses of faith, including other ads touting his Christian leadership and gratuitous quotations from Isaiah. Asked about his surge in the polls, Huckabee said earlier this month, “There’s only one explanation for it, and it’s not a human one. It’s the same power that helped a little boy with two fish and five loaves feed a crowd of five thousand people.”

As he flashes his cross for all to see, Huckabee and his campaign routinely launch populist tirades against economic conservatives, denouncing “the Club for Greed” and the “Washington-Wall Street Axis.” He is denouncing people whose support he will need if he wins the nomination — and considering his record of raising taxes, one might expect a more conciliatory approach. He has adopted the language of President Bush’s “compassionate conservatism,” also known as “bigger government.” He prefers talks with Iran to further confrontation, but beyond that has been far from articulate on foreign policy.

In the opposite corner stands former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the fading frontrunner and Huckabee’s polar opposite. Giuliani’s personal life is the dream of every opposition researcher. Any dip into the New York Post archives on the twice-divorced Catholic Giuliani — who his Church may come to criticize along the way — gives credence to Hillary Clinton as a champion of family values.

Giuliani is pro legal abortion, and this alone will cost him many votes, both in the primary and in a general election against a pro-abortion Democrat. Unlike Huckabee, Giuliani looks to be trying to attract Republicans who disagree with him on key issues, yet his nomination would nonetheless create the greatest demand for a third-party candidate since 1996, or even 1992.

Giuliani’s record on taxes and his understanding of complex economic issues such as health insurance are his main selling points for the average conservative. But on just about everything else — including gun rights — he is a Republican apostate. While distancing himself from Bush’s failure of “compassionate conservatism,” Rudy advocates an even more aggressive foreign policy that may include war with Iran. For those already firmly in his camp, this is terrific — for many others on the Right, it is terrifying.

A Huck-Rudy showdown would be a primary fight between two candidates with almost nothing in common. It would polarize and tear apart the Republican party just as the national electorate is currently polarized.

Such a disaster is a very distinct possibility. If Huckabee takes out Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire, or else heads off a resurgent McCain in South Carolina (or even Michigan), everything could come down to the close race developing between Huckabee and Giuliani in Florida. By the time Feb. 5 is over, Huckabee and Giuliani could be the clear frontrunners with their delegate counts, and more than half the convention delegates will have already been awarded.

For the late contests, Republicans of one stripe would decide that Rudy is the only man who can stop Huckabee. And Republicans of a different stripe would fall in behind Huckabee as the only man who can stop Rudy. This bitter fight would also leave many Republican voters with a paralyzing choice between two poor general election candidates. From there, it becomes a Republican blood feud unless a third candidate can force a brokered convention.

— David Freddoso is an NRO staff reporter.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1nyisaforeigncountry; 2008; giuliani; huckabee; huckster; rinorudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2008 9:01:15 AM PST by RKB-AFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

There’s other states with a voice? Really? And here I thought is was all about Iowa.


2 posted on 01/01/2008 9:06:20 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

To the extent that so-called “religious conservatives” support Huckaby, they demonstrate they are, at best, not at all conservative, and at worst, that they are, shall we say, easily led...


3 posted on 01/01/2008 9:07:04 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

Here’s an idea - dump the Huckster, dump Giuliani (and dump Mitt and McQueeg, too) and get behind Fred. Fred has what the SoCons, the Fiscons, and the DefCons are all looking for.


4 posted on 01/01/2008 9:12:47 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Fred Head and proud of it! Fear the Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Huck-Rudy showdown would be a primary fight between two candidates with almost nothing in common. It would polarize and tear apart the Republican party just as the national electorate is currently polarized.

Make you wonder whether the Huckster's sudden rise was financed by George Soros front groups.

In the end, though, the Huckster simply lacks the intellectual necessities to head a ticket, so he will take second spot behind Guilani.

5 posted on 01/01/2008 9:13:30 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
To the extent that so-called “religious conservatives” support Huckaby, they demonstrate they are, at best, not at all conservative, and at worst, that they are, shall we say, easily led...

I think the ranks of most of the people that attend these huge mega-churches are made up of people like that.

6 posted on 01/01/2008 9:13:56 AM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Here’s even a better idea! Dump them all and start fresh!


7 posted on 01/01/2008 9:14:11 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I will not for Huckafraud under any circumstances.


8 posted on 01/01/2008 9:14:40 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

Hmmm... no mention of McCain, Fred, or Hunter. Nope, no bias here. More evidence of the drive-by’s efforts to manipulate the GOP turnout.


9 posted on 01/01/2008 9:15:41 AM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

Freddoso is another Noo Yawk cosmo shilling for Rudy over that “dumb hick” Huck. Why does this idiot even think that its going to be Huckster versus Giussolini anyway? What about Romney and McCain?


10 posted on 01/01/2008 9:16:06 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor", Like Me ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

To the extent that so-called “religious conservatives” support Huckaby, they demonstrate they are, at best, not at all conservative, and at worst, that they are, shall we say, easily led...


To the extent that so-called “business conservatives” support Guiliani and Romney, they demonstrate they are, at best, not at all conservative, and at worst, that they are, shall we say, easily led...

+++++

If Thompson doesn’t get the nomination, get used to the idea of a Hillary presidency.


11 posted on 01/01/2008 9:16:11 AM PST by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

Huckleberry is the GOP’s version of Jimma “I’ze born again” Carter.

For any Christians who are supporting this imbecile, get a clue. You are supposed to be “wise as serpents...”, not stupid, gullible sheep, led around by anyone who can quote from the Bible. You are supposed to be wise and have discernment. And if you do, you won’t be supporting this loser.


12 posted on 01/01/2008 9:16:40 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Fred has what the SoCons, the Fiscons, and the DefCons are all looking for.

Excellent idea!

13 posted on 01/01/2008 9:17:59 AM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

Left out the word “vote”.

Huckabee cannot win a national election, so if he is nominated, the GOP will have committed political suicide.


14 posted on 01/01/2008 9:18:38 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

The Huckster is kinda ticking me off. I don’t know what it is, but he’s doing nothing to motivate me. Duncan’s going nowhere and Thompson is not catching on. ?, Is this the year of the sheep?


15 posted on 01/01/2008 9:18:45 AM PST by BOATSNM8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Huckabee has surged because he won a couple of debates and he’s got evangelical support. If a quick rise can happen to the liberal pro-life evangelical Huckster, it can happen to the conservative pro-life evangelical Hunter.

.

.

.

.

According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts

Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts

In this poll Hunter is up 3% and even with Paul and Thompson.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=3481ef60-8195-46a9-af04-b87b907bcfdd


16 posted on 01/01/2008 9:18:58 AM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

I have to say something. I said it on an earlier thread. The Fred campaign may be more wise than we have given them credit for.

While all the others are out there pounding each other, Fred is just now making a run.

By now, we are sick of all of the frontrunners, but we are yet to be sick of Fred.

Maybe a brilliant strategy and leave Fred as the last man standing.


17 posted on 01/01/2008 9:20:27 AM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

From there, it becomes a Republican blood feud unless a third candidate can force a brokered convention.
***Intrade/Rasumussen currently show the chances of a brokered GOP convention to be 15%.

REP.NOM.2008.BROKERED
The 2008 Republican Pres. Nominee to be selected at a Brokered Convention M 15.0 20.0 15.0 60 0


18 posted on 01/01/2008 9:21:14 AM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Ping!


19 posted on 01/01/2008 9:24:00 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor", Like Me ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Thats my hope...but watching people align for Huck has me thinking that the intelligence quotient is missing.


20 posted on 01/01/2008 9:24:02 AM PST by donnab (saving liberal brains...one moron at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson